So - given that the articulate mulatto graduate of the Permanent Secret Government's finishing school is in place, might we take some small measure of hope from the fact that he would seem, nevertheless, to have a racially-based constituency of his own that is not altogether Semitically-correct in its attitudes?

If we note the historic tension and antagonism that developed between the major ethnically-correct and morally-entitled minorities (which developed amidst and despite their mutual cooperation in anti-majoritarian enterprises), may we infer that an awakening of the more populous and primitive element of this combination to a century-long, institutionalized bankster racketeering by the lesser but more sophisticated element (see Money as Debt [give it 20 seconds to start]) might lead to developments that favor the restructuring of money-creation in a regime that is otherwise arranged to suit only the latter?

Sadly, we are driven to this resort for hope, since we must account the odds of a significant majoritarian reaction to be nil, looking at that prospect in detail.

For the Weenie Liberal Left, on the one hand, requires that its notions conform to standards of Main Stream Media and pseudo-academic fashionability (unless an otherwise impermissible conspiracy theory identifies fascists as the malefactors involved (z.B., the "Military-Industrial Complex" as the assassin of JFK - and "9-11" as a production pulled off by Bushite right-wing extremists)). And this discussion of banking regulation and reformation unfortunately smacks of historic Populist crankery and typical allegations against a Chosen people now having attained the status of Sacred Cows in Liberal theology.

On the other hand, the Jingoist Patriotard Right, with its Gung-Ho/Can-Do/Bring-It-On/Defending-Our-Freedom/Democracy-Spreading/Good-Doing-with-Gunfire mentality is challenged beyond its means in grasping the issue, and lacks the pre-existing prejudices of the primitive ethnic element, mentioned above, that knows its historic partner up close and personal and thus from whom we might expect the only muscular reaction to the present monetary crisis. And finally, the Evangelicals, with their Judeo-fascist sympathies and eschatological expectations, are going to be Raptured, anyway, so what does it matter.


  1. Americans/Greater Judeans are of three basic ideological/theological orientations and cultures:

    1) "Weenies" are upper-middle-class egalitarian-utopian moralists of caring and compassion, grown intellectually sloppy through decades of Jewish/Weenie cultural dominance, such that ideological opposition thereto is never engaged but is merely peremptorily dismissed.

    Intellectually strong in a vocational sense, Weenies are physically and emotionally weak and cowardly, except where fanatical indignation and self-righteousness are provoked by ideological opposition. Given their typical intellectual gifts, Weenies ought to know better than what they have been taught by the Jews, but they cannot face the abyss that otherwise looms behind the loss of their ancestral faith.

    2) "Morons" are lower-to-middle-class Christians, basically, who tend to have a more realistic view of *this* world than the Weenies (whose Utopian/Kingdom of God expectations, rather, have to be realized - before eternal oblivion - in *this* life's singular opportunity to enjoy such an existence).

    Morons now tend to dominate the public arenas of mere debate, since the Jews/Weenies are now smugly entrenched in power and need not authentically argue over that which is now inextricably in place.

    Morons are admirably strong, good-natured, and authentically courageous, but have never failed to believe a historic Jewish lie when told one that they wanted to hear.

    3) "AIDS" cases (Arrested Ideological Development Syndrome) are your Libertarians who have *begun* to think about the logic of ethics but are unable to see, or must emotionally reject, the implications of their own logic. They refuse to recognize the historicity and politico-economic logic of the Iron Law of Oligarchy, which finds all advanced societies factually and necessarily in the hands of aristocratic and/or theocratic elites. They cannot grasp that to argue over form of government and the supposed variety of political "systems" is to discuss a choice of tools and weapons rather than ethics and morality. AIDS cases fail to understand that the issue is not quantity or quality of government - rather it is a question of *whose* government it is. For *all* governments are governments of *men* - a "government of laws" is a pathetic illusion.

  2. Letter to the White Race

    White Man!

    We regret to inform you that your kind has been slated for termination. We, the various Third World majorities of Africa, Asia, India, South America, and the Middle East assert that your long history of success at building civilizations, developing new technologies, creating stable governments, fostering good will, feeding much of the world, and increasing peace and prosperity even amongst the riotous hordes of our own homelands, has made us envious and resentful of you. We, who make up 92% of the global population, feel that we can no longer accept the great disparity between your success and our abject failure. The solution to this inequality should be obvious to all concerned.

    We are planning to invade your ancestral homelands, little by little, and to facilitate this, we have the full cooperation of your controlled media and government, academia, and law enforcement organizations. While we, personally, do not control any of these entities ourselves, we are profiting endlessly from the crypto-Marxist system put in place many decades ago by an ethnic “fifth column” which operates with complete impunity at all levels of your political, academic, and media culture. Their interference in the natural development of your constitutional republics has been indispensable to our efforts to wrest from you the control of everything that you’ve struggled to build and maintain over the last century. Indeed, were it not for them, none of our present plans would have even been possible.

    By carefully controlling and managing the schools, universities, media, and press, this “out group” has managed to convince the great bulk of your racial kinsmen that not only is resistance futile, but that it is immoral, barbaric, depraved, and unworthy of a “thinking” individual. By promoting the stereotype of a “racist redneck resistance”, they have made the idea of a struggle for White Identity a veritable sin in the minds of nearly every White person. In short: they have convinced European-derived peoples that a prolonged suicide is preferable to the unmitigated evil of “racism”.

    While doing this, they have pushed, inch by inch, to open the borders of ALL White nations to our own sullen masses, throwing open the gates to invasion while assuring the public that “race doesn’t matter”. Since race, in fact, DOES matter (and no one knows it better than We), they have likewise put into place a totalitarian system of “hate speech” and “hate crime” laws, to further alienate and penalize those few Whites who might harbor some simmering resentments at the increasing decay of their society and culture. All of this is in keeping with the far-reaching plans of this particular ethnic “out group”, and has been sometimes referred to as the “Long March”.

    The Out Group, who maintains a sense of racial cohesiveness hitherto unknown among even the most tightly-knit of all dispersed human peoples, maintains a grip on the press and electronic media that is nearly monopolistic in its all-encompassing reach. Since they are so thoroughly in control of these organs for the dissemination of propaganda, they are in the best position to spread hostility against the White peoples of Europe and America, inciting the minority against the majority in these lands: Black against White, Latino against White, Asian against White, Arab against White, Indian against White, and so on, and so forth.

    This is facilitated by decades of brainwashing, beginning in early school years, portraying Whites not as the builders of a great civilization, or the admirable leaders of the Free World, but in a lopsided, entirely slanted way as oppressors, enslavers, genocidal “Nazis”, southern Klansmen, imperialistic Colonials, and toothless hillbillies just itching for a chance to lynch the first colored individual that comes along. This brainwashing not only inflames the minorities in these now racially-mixed “schools”, but also inculcates a sense of “White guilt” that the Out Group finds particularly useful in maintaining control.

    Hence, you Whites have become a neutered, egoless herd of cattle, easily manipulated and posing no threat to the Out Group, who live in perpetual terror of your ever waking up to their plans. The Out Group has a long-running resentment and fear of White civilization, and thus have worked within that civilization to undermine its cohesion and sense of purpose. The promotion of homosexuality, pornography, drugs, divorce, illicit sex, moral relativism, atheism, communism, gun control, “anti-racism”, and “civil rights”, has been the greatest boon to this subversive faction, who are but a tiny minority among you, but who wield awesome, incomparable power.

    Thus, in light of the fact that you are socially, morally, mentally, intellectually, and even legally castrated, We, the teeming masses of the Third World who thirst for what you have and what we can never obtain, are going to finally swamp your once noble and advanced societies, your pristine cities and unsullied neighborhoods, and rape your countries for everything they are worth.

    We are going to move in, right under your noses, and set our churches, mosques, synagogues, and strange gods up in place of your own. We will ensure that OUR celebrations and festivities and holidays are observed, while YOURS are erased from the pages of history.

    We will drain the public coffers of welfare, food stamps, and all forms of social aid available. We will swamp your children’s schools, change the language in which lessons are taught, form street gangs to terrorize and torment your family, steal, vandalize, harass, threaten, and cajole you until we get what WE want.

    That it will be entirely at your expense is irrelevant to us.

    We will beat and murder your sons; we will rape your wives and daughters.

    We kill twelve Americans every day; your government could care less.

    We have shut down hospitals with our teeming numbers. We have flooded the streets, demanding “special rights” for those millions of us that are here illegally.

    We nearly had your major politicians ready to grant all of us an “amnesty” in the name of “diversity” and “equal rights”. We are filling up the ranks for unskilled labor. We are raping pre-teens. We are doing the jobs Americans won’t do.

    As your global economy crumbles, and it gets harder and harder to feed your families, as your birthrate plummets and you face the eventual dispossession of the country your forefathers founded for YOU and YOUR posterity, just remember: there is nothing you can do to stop us. The Out Group has made sure that the law is on OUR side, not yours. No matter how piffling your criticism of us is, the Out Group will use their media to label you with shocking epithets and broad smears: racist, hater, bigot, neo-Nazi, nativist, White supremacist, domestic terrorist, etc.

    If we want to, we can assault and kill you with near impunity. The media will not report it, and if they do, they will place the blame for the assault squarely on YOUR shoulders, not ours. In Jena, Louisiana, a White boy was beaten mercilessly by six black criminals. The media made the criminals into the victims.

    We watch these developments carefully, and we like what we see. Soon, you will be a minority even in your own homelands (you are already a minority worldwide), and we will continue to squeeze and squeeze until there is nothing left of you. We will crush your countries, your cultures, and eventually, we will snuffle out your lives.

    Beethoven, Mozart, Shakespeare, and all other bourgeois manifestations of your high culture will be vanquished forever. All of your legends and heroes will be spat upon, purged, and finally forgotten. Your cultural folkways will be transgressions; your identity will become a crime.

    We come for your JOBS, your MONEY, your WOMEN, and eventually your LIVES. It will not be much longer now.

    In closing, We, the huddled masses of the Third World yearning to “breathe free”, would like to thank the Out Group, the media monopolists and political plunderers who made all of this possible. We wish them well, and we know they wish us well, just as long as we don’t trespass upon their own homeland, which they stole fair and square several decades ago.

    Adios, White man! You had a good, long run, but your day is over, and ours is just beginning. Your empire is at an end, and your race is no longer wanted here. We’ll have our fun with you while you still hang on by a thread, but soon, the thread will be cut, and the abyss yawns beneath you and the civilization your kind spawned.

    Besides, many of you are even anticipating this with something akin to sick glee. After all, that’s how the TV set told them to feel. The brainwashing is almost complete, and the sheep are in line to shear.

    Have a nice day!

  3. (What's wrong with white men? In search of an explanation
    Kevin MacDonald
    February 24, 2009)

    In my previous column, I attempted to analyze two important sex differences in political behavior: Women’s tendency to be attracted to wealthy, powerful men, and women’s relatively greater attraction to close relationships, empathy, and nurturance. These differences make women less likely to be attracted to white racialist movements given the current political context.

    But these differences are not the main cause of our malaise. A correspondent writing to me about my last column said that I should ask why white men are such wimps that they are basically lying down and allowing themselves to be displaced.

    It’s a good question. How could a race of people that conquered the world suddenly lose confidence and voluntarily cede power? What explains the culture of Western suicide?

    White men have to look in the mirror when thinking about our ongoing dispossession. After all, even though there is a preponderance of men in societies of people who explicitly advocate the interests of European-Americans, these men represent a miniscule percentage of the European-American male population. One such society, the Charles Martel Society, is named for Charles Martel, a man who stood up for his people by leading an army against invading Muslims. This is what one should expect from men. But such men — and people willing to follow such a man into battle to preserve their people and culture — are vanishingly rare among contemporary Europeans, whether in Europe or the European Diaspora.

    Consider again the evolutionary theory of sex. In my last column, I sketched out how it explains the general contours of female behavior. Here I draw out the implications for male behavior. Females are the sex with a high investment in reproduction — pregnancy, lactation, and child care. Since the act of reproduction costs little for men, a general rule of nature is that males must compete with other males for access to females. This results in the prediction that males will be more aggressive than females and that the main targets of their aggression will be other males.

    Male aggression over access to females is common in nature. Males fight each other, and the winner gets to mate with the females. For example, a coalition of male lions taking over a pride drives off or kills the resident males and then commits infanticide on the offspring of the males they displaced. They then mate with the females. In nature, males who were not aggressive and didn't try to control territory did not leave offspring. The cowardly lion is a literary invention, nothing more.

    Male aggression against other males is a common theme of human history. In the US, around 90% of violent crime is committed by males and the vast majority is against other males; the same pattern can be seen around the world. Warfare has always been a male enterprise, and it is easy to see why. Consider Genghis Khan. As the victorious Mongol armies spread throughout Asia, he and his descendants established harems of women and sired large numbers of children. Recent genetic research shows that he now has around 16 million male descendents scattered throughout Asia. Like the invading lion coalition, there was a huge payoff for the winners of war throughout human history.

    This basic evolutionary logic also implies that males should attempt to control the political process. Throughout history (at least until very recently), powerful men have left more descendants.

    Just as Charles Martel and his army defeated the invading Muslims, and just as armies of men fought to the death against Genghis Khan to protect their women and hold onto their territory, we should expect that white men would fight to prevent the mass immigration that will soon make them a relatively powerless minority. We should expect them to mobilize fiercely against affirmative action policies that discriminate against them. We should expect them to be hostile to the culture that promotes non-whites into prestigious positions that make them attractive to white women. We should expect a Charles Martel-like figure to easily rally their allegiance to reclaim their heritage.

    But we don’t see that. White men are wimps.

    I suppose we could simply throw out the evolutionary theory of sex. But the power of this theory for explaining the general outlines of human history is indisputable.

    The key, I think, is to realize that, unlike animals, humans evolved a completely novel set of control processes that enable humans to control their natural impulses. These control processes allow for a very large influence of human culture on our behavior. The problem with white men is our culture.

    Nevertheless, there seem to be some specific traits of whites that make them more prone to accepting a culture of suicide. In the following, I briefly discuss the outlines of an explanation and include links to longer versions of these ideas.

    First, there is a strong strand of individualism in Western culture. Compared to other cultures, we are less prone to identifying with our people. Individual white men looking at the contemporary situation think more in terms of their own prospects rather than the prospects of white people in general.

    I have talked to quite a few white men who, after telling them my concerns, simply say that they and their families will be able to afford to flee the negative effects of mass immigration. They will take their family and move to someplace like New Zealand — never mind that in the long run finding a predominantly white country that wants to stay that way will be more and more difficult. Or they will retreat to a gated community — ignoring the long term effects of transferring political power to coalitions of non-white groups with insatiable demands for public services and eventually the need for confiscatory taxes to support them.

    Incidentally, as a Californian, the writing is clearly on the wall for people like me. (Vdare.com’s Joe Guzzardi had the sense to leave.) There is a massive budget shortfall due in no small part to the need for public services for the ever expanding poor, many of them illegal. (One fifth of Los Angeles County — over 2.2 million people — is now on public assistance and the number is expected to grow in the current economic environment.) The Democrats are now only a few votes short of the 2/3 majority in the legislature needed to raise taxes without any Republican support at all. They recently raised taxes substantially with only a few Republican defectors (including Gov. Schwarzenegger). At the national level, the Obama Administration will do nothing to stem the tide of legal immigration, and it seems to be gearing up to give citizenship to illegal immigrants.

    California is the wave of the future for the US as a whole, and there is little doubt that the future of California as a Third World society is already here.

    It’s going to be harder and harder to hide from all of this, but that won’t stop the individualists from thinking that they can at least save themselves and their families.

    Another problem with white men is a corollary of Western individualism: The best among us are far too prone to accepting moral principles even when they are massively incompatible with normal human self-interest. This is the Western commitment to moral universalism — the tendency to erect abstract moral principles that apply to all people and let the chips fall where they may. Familiar examples are democracy, the Constitution, immigration as a human right, and free trade,

    I am not saying there is anything necessarily wrong with these ideals. It’s just that they should always be examined according to whether they are in our interest as a people, or we run the danger of literally dying for our principles.

    Jews do not have this problem. As has often been stated to the point of being a cliché (even among Jews), the only moral principle Jews recognize is whether it's good for the Jews. The Judeocentric bias of the entire written Jewish law from the Old Testament through the Talmud is apparent to even the most casual reader.

    In other words, the only measure of an action is whether it benefits the group, not whether it conforms to a moral principle. When the Jewish left was under pressure during the McCarthy era, the organized Jewish community strongly opposed restrictions on free speech and academic freedom. (This was a period when organizations, such as the Jewish Peoples Fraternal Order which had been listed as subversive by the US government, were affiliated with mainstream Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress.) Now that the left is in charge, Jewish organizations are spearheading attempts to restrict free speech.

    Jews are also remarkably immune to moral critiques from non-Jews. For example, critiques of Israel based on moral principles are a commonplace these days. Perhaps most noteworthy are the moral indictments of Israel by President Jimmy Carter and by prominent academics John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. Both critiques point to the brutal treatment of Palestinians and the emergence of an apartheid, racialist society in Israel that is anathema to the principles of democracy, human rights and racial egalitarianism so often held up as Western values and promoted by Jews when it suits their interests. (Despite Richard Perle's ourtrageous lies, mouthing support for democracy was a staple of neoconservative rhetoric in support of wars in the Middle East on behalf of Israel.) But such criticisms of Israel and its Jewish supporters in the West are completely without effect on the activist core of Jews that determine public policy toward Israel.

    Jews have been quite aware that Europeans are very susceptible to moral critiques. Consider Israel Zangwill, a Jewish writer and activist from a century ago. Here he comments on how Jews can break down the resistance of Americans to immigration:

    America has ample room for all the six millions of the Pale [i.e., the Pale of Settlement, home to most of Russia’s Jews]; any one of her fifty states could absorb them. And next to being in a country of their own, there could be no better fate for them than to be together in a land of civil and religious liberty, of whose Constitution Christianity forms no part and where their collective votes would practically guarantee them against future persecution.

    In other words, American constitutional democracy is good for Jews because its founding documents do not explicitly state that the United States is a Christian nation; nor, for that matter, do they explicitly state that it is a country created by and for people of European descent.

    Zangwill's comments mark the beginning of the idea that America is a "proposition nation" with no ethnic or religious implications. America is a set of principles, not an expression of a particular religion or ethnic group.

    The idea that America is a proposition nation was expanded by Horace Kallen, another Jewish intellectual activist and ardent Zionist. It has become a bedrock ideology across the entire Jewish political spectrum from the far left to the neoconservative right. Whereas Zionists like Zangwill and Kallen viewed Israel as the expression of the Jewish people, they conceptualized the United States as simply a set of principles with no ethnic or religious content.

    During the debates over the Immigration Law of 1924, restrictionists were well aware that Jewish intellectuals were attempting to use Western ideals as a way of undermining the ethnic character of the US. The House Majority Report noted that Zangwill gave a speech where he opposed restrictions on immigration: “You must make a fight against this bill; tell them they are destroying American ideals. Most fortifications are of cardboard, and if you press against them, they give way.”

    In other words, Americans have ideals and we Jews can use their ideals to our advantage in subverting the ethnic character of the US.

    But why are we Europeans so predisposed to moral universalism? I have suggested that this tendency toward individualism and moral universalism stems from our evolution as northern hunter gatherers. (See also here.) In any case, the tendency to adopt principle over interest long predated the rise of the hostile Jewish-dominated intellectual and political elites of the 20th century. I have been much struck by the Puritan intellectual elite who were so influential in the United States prior to the rise of the hostile Jewish-dominated elite of the 20th century. These people personified the idealism that seems to be a trait of so many white people.

    What is striking is the moral fervor of the Puritans. The Yankee Puritans were susceptible to appeals to a “higher law,” and they tended to believe that the main purpose of government is to pursue moral perfection. They tended to paint political alternatives as starkly contrasting moral imperatives, with one side portrayed as evil incarnate—inspired by the devil.

    Puritans pursued utopian causes framed as moral issues and went to war with people who disagreed with them. Whatever the political and economic complexities that led to the Civil War, it was the Yankee condemnation of slavery on moral grounds that inspired the massive killing of closely related Anglo-Americans in order to free slaves brought over from Africa. The Civil War was the greatest sacrifice of lives and property ever made by Americans.

    It is not surprising that the descendants of the Puritans became supporters of the Culture of Critique with the rise of the hostile Jewish intellectual and political elites in the 20th century. All of these Jewish-dominated movements were moral indictments of America. Just as the Puritan intellectuals of the 19th century were attracted to all manner of utopian movements, the movements advanced by the Jewish intellectual elite were advanced as utopian visions of the future:

    ·All people have the same biological potential for accomplishment. and no culture is better than any other. As a result, we can easily mold people into ideal citizens (Boasian anthropology).

    ·We can create a classless society in which there will be no conflicts of interest and people will altruistically work for the common good (Marxism).

    ·We can create a society in which people will be in tune with their sexuality and free of neuroses, anti-Semitism, and "racism" (psychoanalysis).

    ·We can create a multicultural paradise in which different racial and ethnic groups will live in harmony and cooperation (the Frankfurt School of Social Research).

    ·We can easily transform other societies into democracies and should wage war to remake other societies in our image (neoconservatism).

    It goes without saying that each of these utopias is profoundly problematic from an evolutionary perspective. But each of them has been advocated by droves of white people in recent decades.

    Like all societies, America and other Western societies have their share of moral lapses. Unlike other ethnic groups, we seem intent on committing suicide in order to atone for these lapses. So that we can live up to our principles.

    A more mundane reason why white men do not stand up and assert their interests is that it is very costly to do so. Because of the triumph of the hostile intellectual and political elite in the West, those dissenting from the official orthodoxies are severely punished. They are socially ostracized and they may well lose their jobs if they speak out. (As a tenured professor, I have no excuse for not doing so.)

    On the other hand, becoming a part of the hostile elite results in great rewards and is often a good career move for individualistic white men. This doubtless goes a long way toward explaining the non-Jews who have eagerly joined a variety of movements dominated by Jews. For example, non-Jewish neocons are rewarded with well-paying careers at prestigious think tanks and universities; they are able to secure book deals with major publishers and become prominent in the mainstream media. Life is good.

    I have noted that throughout Jewish history, especially since the Enlightenment, Jews have used non-Jews to act as the publically visible face of movements that are dominated by strongly identified Jews who are pursuing Jewish interests. Of course this behavior is made easier for whites because they are more individualistic to start with. Having a great career is its own reward. And the whites who get involved in these Jewish movements may well see themselves as acting on the basis of their principles. Happiness for a white person is the confluence of self-interest and deeply held principle.

    And because the hostile elite dominates the mainstream media and academic institutions, whites are socialized to adopt views that are suicidal to their own people. Basic psychology implies that people are much more likely to emulate people and ideas that are associated with high status. The ideology of white suicide achieves much of its effectiveness because it comes from Harvard and the *New York Times*.

    However, the marginalization of John Mearsheimer (University of Chicago), Steven Walt (Harvard), and former President Carter shows that even messages associated with institutions of high status have an enormous uphill climb to influence public policy when they conflict with the agendas of the hostile elite.

    Clearly, there are some very powerful forces at work in producing the culture of Western suicide — some internal to Europeans as a people, and some external. However, there are also some rays of hope. Psychological research shows that whites continue to have an unconscious sense of white identity — what I term implicit whiteness. Despite the constant bombardment of anti-white propaganda in the media, whites prefer to live and work with each other. Some subcultures, such as classical music, country music and rock bands like AC/DC are implicitly white even though they dare not speak their name as white subcultures.

    This is even true of some leftist white subcultures such as Garrison Keillor’s Prairie Home Companion with its gentle jabs at overly serious (and overly principled) Scandinavians (the ones who attend the Church of Our Lady of Perpetual Responsibility). It can be seen in PHC's virtually all-white audience and its nostalgia for small-town America. The synopsis for next week’s PHC, titled Small Town Twofer, exudes the flavor of classic (white) Americana:

    Coming up this week on A Prairie Home Companion, a wintery mix of two Minnesota-grown shows. From the beautiful dance floor of the Lakeside Ballroom in Glenwood (from 2006), we'll hear Bill Hinckley and Judy Larson sing "The Barnyard Dance," Adam "Original Biscuit" Granger sings "The Sheik of Araby," and Guy Noir goes in search of a red shoe that holds the key to one man's happiness. From the University of Minnesota in the historic railroad town of Morris, a show from the well scrubbed P.E. Center (a.k.a. the gym), Tim Sparks and Pat Donohue team up in a pickin' frenzy to play "Freight Train", Prudence Johnson and Garrison sing Utah Philips, and Dusty and Lefty stumble into a BioMass Gasification Plant. Plus, in The News from Lake Wobegon, the story of Jellyglass Mortenson and His Six Hot Pickles.

    This implicit sense of whiteness is not enough to begin the revolution, and Keillor will certainly be no help in that direction. (I'd love to see how he would score on the Implicit Association Test, a test that taps unconscious pro-white biases and unconscious negative attitudes toward blacks. Research shows that the largest gaps between unconscious attitudes toward African Americans and conscious, explicit attitudes are found among white liberals like Keillor.) He is among the many in the media in the midst of a slobbering love affair with President Obama. On being told recently that Obama was not a good singer, Keillor noted something to the effect that he was glad that there was something Obama didn't excel at because he was beginning to think that Obama was superhuman.

    For a revolution we need to legitimize an explicit sense of white identity and interests. All the science, the morality, and the common sense are on our side. Basically, we have to stop being wimps. And stop being so damned principled.

    [I, NN, comment:]

    Nietzsche's interpretative framework nicely explains White "wimpery":

    Whereas today's native Whites will still readily resist and seek liberation from an "evil," "unjust," and "oppressive" invasion and occupation by the armed forces of another nation, they cannot convincingly oppose the disorganized and disarmed intrusion of those who share their own origins in the slave/peasant/worker/lumpenproletarian classes of history and who bring with themselves the same basic estate to which this fraternal, egalitarian, liberationist slave morality appeals.

    The lower orders (with the notable exception of the residual primitive master-element amongst them, i.e., organized criminals retaining the tribal urge to dominate and exploit) are motivated to organized use of force only by righteous appeals to universal principles of justice in national "self-defense" or in "liberating" other nations from "tyrants" and so conferring upon these others the blessings of "justice," "liberty," and "freedom" such as are believed to be the fruits of exported "democracy". It is evident, then, that Whites of the past century-and-a-half are aroused by the ideological expressions of Beatitudinal slave morality, and that the antithetical impulse to masterfully dominate and exploit is now absent.

    Thus, while Whites *are* wimps in the sense of being unable to fight in their own interest (which would be sinful/naughty/selfish/bad/no-no), they remain ever ready, willing, and able to selflessly, ardently, and childishly crusade against the Forces of Evil, whenever and wherever the Church or Jewry directs.

  4. >...I've spoken to quite a few biology majors who entered the field with the intention of "showing it to the evolutionists" and then were forced to completely abandon their creationist superstitions due to the monumental force of the evidence behind evolution.

    [NN responds:]

    Good to hear - but somewhat discouraging, in that epistemological sophistication should have been cultivated in such students long before their exposure to specialized courses. One need not be, and should not have to be, exposed to "the evidence behind evolution" in order to understand that there is no reasonable alternative thereto. As a responsible citizen of an enlightened society, one should not have to rely upon specialized training and information in order to decide as between alternative positions regarding significant matters (such as the origins and transformations of organic processes, the IQ controversy, the Holocaust, the origins of WWII, usw). It seems that some 300 million residents of the N. American continent are, generally-speaking, vocationally mature and capable, but are idiotic when called upon to grasp social and biological fundamentals - for lack of any but vocational training supplemented with Judeo-Communist indoctrination in egalitarian/anti-racist ideology and mythology.

    The unfortunate advantage that ideology, theology, and mythology have over epistemologically-disciplined perspectives is the satisfyingly subjective top-down basis of belief, wherein one reasons downward from a paramount pseudo-generalization, assimilating seemingly supportive data and subordinate theory, and rejecting all else. As opposed to deriving theory from the ground of data upward, toward a synthesis that cannot be embarrassed by a balance of contrary evidence and by subordinate theories not mutually supportive.

    It is the case, however, that some general exposure to all the social and natural science disciplines is needed for full epistemological composure, because there is a continuum, starting with physics and ending with political-economy, wherein the "scientific method" can only be applied with decreasing precision as to data, theory, meaningfulness of terminology, replicability of phenomena, and predictive success. The difficulty involved in maintaining discipline in the midst of the increasing "softening" of science as it ascends from its basis in physics is nevertheless an indispensable challenge to which the student should be exposed in order to equip him to dispense with nonsense and superstition, whatever their guise, without resort to specialized knowledge with which he cannot be equipped in regard to every controversy.

  5. Continue to surrender your dignity and sovereignty to the Police State aborning, stupid human cattle, for the sake of postural solidarity with the Levantine Judean mortal insult to Islam, and under the pretense that your own security is threatened:

    We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

    -- US President Obama, statement made on campaign trail in Colorado Springs, July 2, 2008; quoted by World Net Daily, July 15, 2008

  6. So, again, as we see, the question of *class* cannot be ignored in our analyses.

    Excellent comments over there btw. Long before Aryan met Jew on the plains of Asia Minor, the Arya were stealing each other's cattle and women on the steppes, i.e. establishing class -- no different from the old West out here; tribal politics and the "Sakralkönigtum" were everything as illustrated by the Iliad. At bottom a mafia-type social arrangement, bringing us back to the Pashtun with their sanguine tribal rivalries.

    Link me to this Phora discussion if you do e-mail me.

  7. "The economic development the generals talk about, including gas pipeline construction, requires stability," Gary Leupp wrote in Counterpunch on July 6, "But Afghanistan, like Iraq, was destabilized precisely by a U.S. attack and occupation in the first place. More ominously, Pakistan has been destabilized by the invasion of the next-door country." Why are Americans fighting wars in Central Asia for a [Jewish-owned] pipeline from Turkmenistan?

    To understand why Obama is pushing the war in Afghanistan, one needs to understand that the Obama administration is really a Zionist-controlled government. If this were not already abundantly clear, it can be seen by the person appointed to apply U.S. policy in the region. That person is Richard Charles Albert Holbrooke, one of Obama's first appointments. Holbrooke, a Zionist Jew and a long-time associate of Henry Kissinger, is the Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.


    The following are comments from Chicago Jews, extracts taken from the article "Obama and the Jews" written by Pauline Dubkin Yearwood and published in Chicago Jewish News on October 24, 2008.

    "I think when this is all over, people are going to say that Barack Obama is the first Jewish president."
    - Abner Mikva, former congressman from Chicago and counsel to President Clinton.

    Obama is "embedded in the Jewish world."
    - Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, Obama's neighbor and longtime supporter.

    "He's right on all the issues when it comes to Israel. He's in exactly the same place (Hillary) Clinton is, maybe even stronger."
    - Bettylu (Klutznick) Saltzman, daughter of Philip Klutznick, a Chicago developer and leading Zionist who served a leading role in the development of the State of Israel.