SUPERHUMAN: ROOTS ARE SHOWING

ROOTS ARE SHOWING

[Statsaholic:]

NeoNietzsche,

I see what you are saying about the long term goal of rigorous Marxism.

However, I think the “withering away of the State” is something Marxists always conceptualize as being carried out by future generations of Marxists.

I doubt very much that Chinese Marxists will have the clear eyed fanaticism to carry such a scheme out to its final stages.

Even with the madmen of the Bolsheviks, only the Jew Trotsky actually wanted to move in a meaningful way toward the destruction of all Western Political Entities.

And guess what? His foreign policy ideas along these lines were shot down, so to speak (!), by Joseph Stalin.

What reason is there to think that a Chinese Trotsky won’t have his foreign policy ideas shot down by a Chinese Stalin?

[NN:]

It has already happened.

Just as Trotsky was followed by Stalin, then followed by Khruschev,

So Mao was followed by Deng, and now Mao is being revived.

And apostolic Christianity, failing to deliver the promised Advent, was replaced by institutional Catholic Christianity, which was rejected by puritanical Protestantism, in a return to the roots of the faith.

See the pattern?

No comments:

SUPERHUMAN THOUGHT FOR THE DAY:

************************************[06/28/11]************************************

So, how is the "universal liberal democracy" that is supposedly breaking out all over the world - and thus putting an end to "history" - going to interdict the next World War? (click)

[and see 03/07/11, below]

************************************[06/19/11]************************************

Babylon's Banksters (click)

by Tony Blizzard
for henrymakow.com

...What should be emphasized is government created and spent into circulation money opposed to private banker "credit" (bookkeeping entries) loaned into circulation as debt at interest.

The first is a measure of value which facilitates exchanges at no cost while the second is the world's most profitable (because it's a criminal scam) business which steadily steals all wealth, created and natural.

Although seldom mentioned, even by those against private money, there is a deadly problem with all PRIVATE money, a thing of which libertarian "theorists" are in love. It's what the usury attached to fed notes is all about. No usury, no profit; no profit, no money business. Pretty simple.

People like Ron Paul, as well as the whole "Austrian" mis-education center (can't call it a school in reality), insist on misusing the word "fiat" to mean paper. That is not what it means. Loosely translated into English it means "so be it." It indicates that there is a law which says "this is our money (so be it)." Whatever carries the government fiat IS the nation's money. Proof of that to the people is that the government accepts it in payment of taxes.

Much of the monetary confusion in the U.S. is due to a criminal act of the United States Congress in its giving of the fiat to private banker debt (usually called "credit") as our money. Since federal reserve notes are, in fact, evidences of debt, they cannot be money in reality. However they presently must suffice as money by government pretense and enforcement. This government condoned scam is at the bottom of almost every economic problem existing.

Until this lie and injustice is corrected there will never be anything close to economic justice or fairness in the U.S. As one district federal reserve banker publicly stated in the past, if all debts were paid there would not be a single dollar left in circulation. We are totally without any permanent money system. He could have added that many debts wouldn't even be paid because the interest on the loans is never created and cannot be repaid without constant new and exponentially bigger loans rolling it over. The government share of this unpayable interest is usually called "the national debt." The rest is the debt of the citizens of the nation.

People such as Ron Paul are correct that our money is not proper money but neither is their desired substitute which amounts to the thing we already have plus the even worse mistake of insisting on it being metal. No matter what money is physically composed of, without the government fiat it is not proper money. The thing which makes money be money is LAW, not substance. Law and barter are not the same thing.

However, even as law, PROPER money can not be debt but it must carry the government fiat. And it must be governmental created and circulated partly because only government can do this without being forced to make an immediate profit from its circulation, thus eliminating the "third hand" of a private money creator in every transaction.

Further, loans are a banker operation and no government should also be a banker. Government can more easily regulate banks for fairness and justice in loaning than itself can be so regulated by the people.

But with federal reserve notes we have a medium of exchange which can not exist without being loaned, thus combining banking and money creation in a privately owned devil's cocktail of instant corruption and theft of all wealth through the national medium of exchange, the most essential of all modern necessities.

To the extent that this book makes these facts clear it is worthwhile. There is much too much confusion about money. That is because those in control of creating and circulating the world's money today, private bankers all, want it to be confusing.

The last thing they want to happen is for the people at large to learn just how simple is the concept of honest money. And how criminal is the economic mishmash we now live under. For good reason. Their lives would not be worth a dollar of their own false debt if the people understood what they have done and are still doing to them, I care not what their race, ethnicity or background.

************************************[06/16/11]************************************

Gould Standard (click)

************************************[06/03/11]************************************

Greek Tragedy (click)

************************************[05/20/11]************************************

Another colorful confrontation from the past (click)

************************************[05/18/11]************************************

Now, who in the world could have forseen this?

What a Surprise!

(click on the bold white, above, and find out)

And: even more theater for the untermenschen...

************************************[05/15/11]************************************

An aging Henry Kissinger reflected upon past episodes, this morning, during an interview on CBS SUNDAY MORNING.

Renowned for his past diplomacy in regard to China, he informs us that the Chinese are now, in their own minds, recreating the global centrality of Chung-Kuo. But there is no mention here of Communism as the indispensible ideological glue with which the regime was installed and held together since shortly after the Second World War. We implicitly take from K's remarks this morning that the Red Chinese regime has antithetically morphed into a latter-day Nationalist Kuomintang, as is the currently comforting and fashionable view of the looming Chinese "nation" in the context of world affairs.

Kissinger does not redeem himself here as a political sophisticate - for he fails to examine the implications of his own thesis as to the essential nature of the Chinese oligarchy. For the Chinese are now "nationalists" (after the fashion of Putin's putative "Russian" regime) but - as we note and as he does not - are likewise lacking a distinctive ethnic underclass upon which to fully focus cohesive aggression, as do history's conservative, non-expansive regimes.

The PRC oligarchy is thus committed to aggressive international expansion, whether as Communists or Nationalists, as have been all oversized republican and "democratic" political entities in history. This is according to the inescapable logic of political economy, as it applies to all polities that cannot rely upon emigration absorbed by larger entities in order to relieve internal pressures, and to which logic there have been applied none but superficial analyses and forecasts such as Fukuyama's fatuous The End of History and the Last Man.

The bizarre irony of the situation is most evident (to the misplaced comfort of western observers) in the rise of a "Capitalist" middle class - which rather portends a developing threat to the regnant oligarchy that it must eventually decapitate amidst a retrenchment and the initiation of an ideologically unifying Third World War. The "Russians" have already been though this phase on a much smaller scale, with Putin's disposal of the "Oligarchs" in another bit of crude political theater (following the "coup" against Gorbachev, Yeltsin's "defiance" of the hardliners while standing atop the AFV, and the "defence" of democracy as trapped and assaulted in the Parliament building).

But the present strategic arming of China via an economic resurrection is the real thing - and will bring along the classic problems of class war that have had, and will have had, their resolution in global international aggression.

************************************[05/03/11]************************************

[From the column to the left, and as "Junghans" might pertinently have written once again, now regarding the obscene celebration of the killing of ObL : ]

The answer, I believe, lies in the fact that the world’s Anglos have been ideologically Judaized for centuries, and most of them are essentially clueless about it. Many are even pugnaciously “proud” about their willful ignorance of most vital interests. Our people’s philosophical, spiritual, and political immaturity is astounding; huge segments of the White Anglo population think and act like juveniles in adult bodies. Our people's mindset and behavior is nauseating, to say nothing of being flat-out cowardly.

************************************[05/01/11]************************************

So, on this holy day, Osama joins Oswald in the Pantheon of Patsies.

(links in white)

************************************[04/10/11]************************************

NN, whats right is right.

Unfortunately, it's not - because "right" doesn't exist. You can't consistently define it - it hasn't been done because it can't be done. Though the pretense that it can and has been is officially cultivated so as to grant formal authority a spurious aura of universalist legitimacy. And those who have not examined the question and the challenge thoroughly tend to assume that consistent notions of "right," "justice," 'fairness," "equality," usw, are either already realized in legal formulations and/or ethics - or are potentially so. But the nihilistic abyss is deeper than the innocent imagine, for not only is there no "God" to specify personal morality or the form of virtuous government for humanity, he couldn't specify it completely and coherently even if he did exist.

The lesson that the stupid goyim should take from Jewry is that *any* form of government has its uses, and that the appropriate form of state and economy is dictated by the uses to which they are to be put. Political economy allows no permanence of arrangements, because any conceivable arrangement can and will eventually be exploited to the general disadvantage of the populace by that cohesive minority which is requisite for making and enforcing policy decisions in avoidance of eventual disorder and disintegration. The classic problem of "who guards the guardians" has never been solved. And a coherent and complete rule book for guidance of guardian behavior is no more, and in fact is less a possibility, than is the one intended for the masses to be governed.

But don't take my word for it - simply bring forth the coherent and consistent code of conduct for private and public entities that you think does or could exist and prove me wrong. I'll personally phone the Nobel Peace Prize committee on your behalf, whose award will make you a rich man - immortalized in academic and popular culture for a contribution to humanity of cosmological significance. (click)

************************************[04/08/11]************************************

When Q's army attacks an out-of-uniform armed combatant (who is normally subject to summary execution upon capture), has a "civilian" thus been mishandled - so rationalizing what otherwise would be the sanctimonious hypocrisy and chicanery of characterizing the death-dealing initiated by Internationalist-organized rebels as a "humanitarian" enterprise? (click)

************************************[03/07/11]************************************

The parallels between the present second decade of this century and the fourth decade of the last century keep coming back to me - amidst our "Great Recession" that "Quantitative Easing" is minimally relieving by temporarily enhancing M&V in the financial markets rather than having maximal effect by permanently installing debt-free currency in the general economy. I'm thus reminded that the Federal Reserve is reprising its performance in the Great Depression by basically standing aside, where it could otherwise instantly correct the situation by direct reflation of the economy (but as is not in the interest of the Banksters in whose hands our debt-laden monetary past and future lie).

Hence we presently endure another halting attempt at economic recovery, in parallel with the path of the precedent decade, and suspect that a duplicate re-collapse (since FED money was and is nothing but a loan requiring re-payment) is in the offing at the end of the Twenty-tens. We further suspect that today's brewing international disturbances will thus come to a boil some twenty-five years before the mid-century mark - at which latter time catastrophic developments would no longer rely upon pre-emptive initiatives by political leadership. That is, political leadership once again having, instead, anticipated their otherwise inevitable loss of initiative as against their political and national enemies and so proceeded preemptively in avoidance thereof (as was the occasion for the initiation of WWI, which might have been delayed the parallel twenty-five years until the WWII period, at which point an outbreak could not have been avoided due to popular pressure on several regimes - especially those of Russia and Japan).

In the on-coming instance, rather, the climactic trigger will be the developing opportunity to comprehensively apply le coup to fiscally-throttled and demoralized Western military resources, world-wide, with man-portable nuclear weapons - for which cleverly-arranged catastrophe an Islamic power or powers will naturally be thought responsible, a'la the 9-11 false-flag operation, should any retaliatory capability (aboard surviving ballistic- and cruise-missile submarines?) remain to fall upon suspected perpetrators.

(links in white)

[see 06/28/11, above]

************************************[03/06/11]************************************

Learned yet another cosmetic euphemism today: "dynamic entry".

Also learned, as reported by a "Special Forces" GJ Janissary stooging for Zion in Afghanistan, that they are "fighting for truth" as they blast their way into the homes and property of the natives in pursuit of the instruments of "Terror".

************************************[03/05/11]************************************

A reader of The Phora was directed hereto by a link located amidst this extraordinary exchange from August 2006. (click)

************************************[02/09/11]************************************

‘Catastrophic Zionism’: How Turmoil Benefits Israel

By Michael Collins Piper

If there is anything that can be said about the crisis in Egypt—which is reverberating throughout the Middle East—it is that it is ultimately open to multiple interpretations. Any “expert” who purports to give you “the last word” on the topic is deceiving you and perhaps himself. Geopolitical strategists, armchair pundits and conspiracy theory devotees are competing to tell the world “what’s really happening and why,” but there is no single truth to the matter.

First of all, consider the issue of popular unrest in Egypt. All serious evidence indicates Hosni Mubarak’s regime has sustained itself through force and oppression and, not surprisingly, support from the Egyptian military. In addition, Mubarak has maintained a close relationship with the United States and, thus, with Israel, with which Egypt entered a controversial peace agreement in 1979 that remains in effect today.

These factors have preserved Mubarak’s rule—at least until now.

However, within Egypt, there has long been widespread discontent among a variety of domestic sources, ranging from Islamic fundamentalists in the Muslim Brotherhood to more “Western”-oriented young people to working families struggling to pay food bills.

So while there is breadth and apparent depth to the opposition, the critics of Mubarak are by no means united across a wide range of issues. However, the economic turmoil plaguing Egypt in recent months seems to have been a critical factor in helping spark the rebellion.

In short, to suggest that the Egyptian rebellion was orchestrated solely by the United States and/or Israel would ignore genuine grassroots Egyptian concerns.

Israel and the American supporters of Israel know that many Egyptians of all political stripes and religious persuasions have never been comfortable with the U.S.-Israeli-Egyptian relationship and that an element of Egyptian opposition to the Mubarak regime has been its cozy concert with Israel.

As a consequence of this, many pro-Israeli elements are taking a firm stand against “democracy” in Egypt precisely because they fear a popularly elected regime replacing Mubarak could be hostile to Israel, no matter what the new regime’s religious flavor—if any at all.

Note, too, that one of the leading critics of the Mubarak regime is Nobel Prize-winning former International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei. Supporters of Israel consider ElBaradei to be problematic because he was a critic of the Bush administration’s campaign against Saddam Hussein of Iraq, raising questions about Bush claims that Saddam was engaged in building nuclear weapons. Likewise, ElBaradei has stood in the way of Israeli and American efforts to provoke a confrontation with Iran over its efforts to engage in nuclear development.

However, there are more than a few observers who perceive ElBaradei as a ubiquitous double-dealer whose agenda is uncertain In the meantime, despite all of this, it is not a stretch of the imagination to believe that Israel could stand to benefit from turmoil in Egypt. The average observer might find this difficult to understand.

While most rational people would assume that Israel would prefer to have neighboring states that are stable, successful participants in the region, this is not necessarily the case.

In fact, a carefully crafted “think piece” entitled “A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s,” featured in the February 1982 edition of the World Zionist Organization’s Jerusalem-based publication Kivunim: A Journal for Judaism and Zionism, candidly put forth an Israeli strategy to wreak havoc in the Arab world, dividing the Arab states from within. The author was Oded Yinon, an Israeli journalist with close ties to Israel’s Foreign Ministry.

The program—which amounted to “balkanizing” the various Arab republics, splitting them into religious enclaves in which, for example, Shiite Muslims or otherwise Sunni Muslims would predominate—was an agenda that Israeli dissident Israel Shahak said, quite simply, was designed “to make an imperial Israel into a world power,” by disrupting the Arab states and thereby setting the stage for Israeli dominance in the Mideast.

The formula was founded on the idea of creating chaos among Israel’s Arab neighbors, hardly a policy any decent, well-meaning neighbor could be credited for fostering. In fact, the current-day political and religious divisions and devastation in Iraq—the consequence of the American invasion of Iraq demanded by the pro-Israel lobby in Washington—mirrors precisely what the Zionist position paper laid forth as the ideal state of affairs for Iraq, from an Israeli point of view, that is.

But where does Egypt fit into all of this? Reflecting on the Zionist strategy paper, Ralph Schoenman—an eminent American Jewish critic of Zionism—writing in 1988 in his book, The Hidden History of Zionism, pointedly noted the paper’s intent of “double-crossing Mubarak” and emphasized that the Yinon paper hoped for “the downfall and dissolution of Egypt,” despite the 1979 Camp David peace agreement.

This is geopolitics at its best—or worst—and demonstrates the kind of gambles Israel has historically been willing to take.

After all, Israel helped subsidize and nurture the fledgling Hamas faction within the Palestinian statehood movement, as a means to counter and undermine the secular Fatah faction led by senior Palestinian statesman Yassir Arafat. But Hamas got out of control, grew in popularity, and now stands as one of Israel’s chief rivals.

Such gamesmanship by Israel is part of a philosophy known as “catastrophic Zionism,” a term used almost exclusively by Israeli and Jewish writers.

The theme of “catastrophic Zionism,” sometimes called “war Zionism,” suggests that Israel—as a state— relies on crisis and the potential of war with its neighbors as a foundation of its very existence. This has actually been the belief of many hard-line “right wing” elements going back to the earliest days of Israel.

In short, there are many Zionists who believe such crisis is vital—fundamental—to Israel’s survival. And for this reason, the believers in “catastrophic Zionism” will never lend their support to any policy, domestic or international, that could lead to a final solution of the conflict between Israel and its Arab and Muslim neighbors.

In actual fact, this notion—that peace could be dangerous to the survival of Israel—is a governing concept in the minds of many Israelis and their supporters worldwide.

************************************[02/08/11]************************************

Mitchell Heisman: The Man Who Could No Longer Will (click)

257. EVERY elevation of the type "man," has hitherto been the work of an aristocratic society and so it will always be--a society believing in a long scale of gradations of rank and differences of worth among human beings, and requiring slavery in some form or other. Without the PATHOS OF DISTANCE, such as grows out of the incarnated difference of classes, out of the constant out-looking and down-looking of the ruling caste on subordinates and instruments, and out of their equally constant practice of obeying and commanding, of keeping down and keeping at a distance--that other more mysterious pathos could never have arisen, the longing for an ever new widening of distance within the soul itself, the formation of ever higher, rarer, further, more extended, more comprehensive states, in short, just the elevation of the type "man," the continued "self-surmounting of man," to use a moral formula in a supermoral sense. To be sure, one must not resign oneself to any humanitarian illusions about the history of the origin of an aristocratic society (that is to say, of the preliminary condition for the elevation of the type "man"): the truth is hard. Let us acknowledge unprejudicedly how every higher civilization hitherto has ORIGINATED! Men with a still natural nature, barbarians in every terrible sense of the word, men of prey, still in possession of unbroken strength of will and desire for power, threw themselves upon weaker, more moral, more peaceful races (perhaps trading or cattle-rearing communities), or upon old mellow civilizations in which the final vital force was flickering out in brilliant fireworks of wit and depravity. At the commencement, the noble caste was always the barbarian caste: their superiority did not consist first of all in their physical, but in their psychical power--they were more COMPLETE men (which at every point also implies the same as "more complete beasts").

(HPD Nietzsche,, Beyond Good and Evil)

***********************************[02/06a/11]************************************

There is a reason why the problem of equal justice appears to be insolvable: Life is exploitation. In order to end exploitation, we must end life. In order to end exploitation, we must will death....Ultimately, there is only one way to fulfill the highest aims of egalitarian justice and that way is to will death....Willing death is thus a child of humanism and the logical culmination of its rational quest for universalism.

(Mitchell Heisman, "Suicide Note")

On no point, however, is the ordinary consciousness of Europeans more unwilling to be corrected than on this matter, people now rave everywhere, even under the guise of science, about coming conditions of society in which "the exploiting character" is to be absent--that sounds to my ears as if they promised to invent a mode of life which should refrain from all organic functions. "Exploitation" does not belong to a depraved, or imperfect and primitive society it belongs to the nature of the living being as a primary organic function, it is a consequence of the intrinsic Will to Power, which is precisely the Will to Life--Granting that as a theory this is a novelty--as a reality it is the FUNDAMENTAL FACT of all history let us be so far honest towards ourselves!

(HPD Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil)

************************************[02/06/11]************************************

Moral superiority compensated for [Jewish] political-military inferiority....By dividing the world into its characteristic notions of good and evil, Jews would see the world with moral clarity so that the job of repairing the world (tikkun olam), starting with themselves, could get done.
...

Consider the significance of Deuteronomy 20:17-18, a passage now considered one of the most morally problematic sections of the Bible for its sanction of genocide. Even this action was justified on the basis of corrupting cultural behaviors: “…you shall utterly destroy them…so that they will not teach you to act according to all their abominations that they performed for their gods, so that you will sin to Hashem, your God.” Genocide was justified with memocide. It was sensitivity to the corrupting cultural influence of the Canaanites that sanctioned their destruction. This passage stands out in modern times only because other peoples of those times who engaged in the very same violent behaviors did not record their deeds in a comparable epic still culturally valued today.

(Mitchell Heisman, "Suicide Note")

Since there is no "moral superiority" or "moral clarity" to be had by anyone - the least of whom are themselves timelessly genocidal political subversives, as above - young Heisman, in his sympathetic and cosmetic account of "supernatural" and "postbiological" Judaism and its derivatives, unwittingly pronounces the epitaph of human life on the planet, as brought to an end by his fellow Jews and their Hebrews manques, and so validates the harshest condemnation of sanctimoniously subversive, hypocritically ethnocentric, leave-alive-nothing-that-breathes (lest it soil the Jew with gentile filth), crypto-anarchic Judaism - and its derivatives.

(NeoNietzsche)

--The Jews are the most remarkable people in the history of the world, for when they were confronted with the question, to be or not to be, they chose, with perfectly unearthly deliberation, to be at any price: this price involved a radical falsification of all nature, of all naturalness, of all reality, of the whole inner world, as well as of the outer. They put themselves against all those conditions under which, hitherto, a people had been able to live, or had even been permitted to live; out of themselves they evolved an idea which stood in direct opposition to natural conditions--one by one they distorted religion, civilization, morality, history and psychology until each became a contradiction of its natural significance. We meet with the same phenomenon later on, in an incalculably exaggerated form, but only as a copy: the Christian church, put beside the "people of God," shows a complete lack of any claim to originality. Precisely for this reason the Jews are the most fateful people in the history of the world: their influence has so falsified the reasoning of mankind in this matter that today the Christian can cherish anti-Semitism without realizing that it is no more than the final consequence of Judaism.

In my "Genealogy of Morals" I give the first psychological explanation of the concepts underlying those two antithetical things, a noble morality and a ressentiment morality, the second of which is a mere product of the denial of the former. The Judaeo-Christian moral system belongs to the second division, and in every detail. In order to be able to say Nay to everything representing an ascending evolution of life--that is, to well-being, to power, to beauty, to self-approval--the instincts of ressentiment, here become downright genius, had to invent an other world in which the acceptance of life appeared as the most evil and abominable thing imaginable. Psychologically, the Jews are a people gifted with the very strongest vitality, so much so that when they found themselves facing impossible conditions of life they chose voluntarily, and with a profound talent for self-preservation, the side of all those instincts which make for decadence--not as if mastered by them, but as if detecting in them a power by which "the world" could be defied. The Jews are the very opposite of decadents: they have simply been forced into appearing in that guise, and with a degree of skill approaching the non plus ultra of histrionic genius they have managed to put themselves at the head of all decadent movements (--for example, the Christianity of Paul--), and so make of them something stronger than any party frankly saying Yes to life. To the sort of men who reach out for power under Judaism and Christianity,--that is to say, to the priestly class-decadence is no more than a means to an end. Men of this sort have a vital interest in making mankind sick, and in confusing the values of "good" and "bad," "true" and "false" in a manner that is not only dangerous to life, but also slanders it.

(HPD Nietzsche, The AntiChrist)

************************************[02/05/11]************************************

[Heisman elaborates:]

[The Jews'] God commanded the supernatural veto of the justice of natural selection — the natural justice of death for the weak and survival for the strong. God is the breaking of the vicious cycle that pushes the low lower and raises the strength of the stronger. The rupture of this “evil” oppressive vicious cycle under the transcendent law of God was the beginning of a non-cyclical or historical view of the cosmos. The Jewish conception of a non-cyclical universe represents a rupture of the primordial, biological cosmos.

Freedom from Egyptian slavery is a metaphor for a larger story of freedom: freedom from slavery to genes. Freedom from slavery to the genes could be achieved only through submission to God’s postbiological laws. The beginning of the beginning was revolt against slavery to the genes. This is why the Mosaic revolution was all of one piece: a singular, monotheistic vision of transcending the human cycles ruled by the laws of the genes. This is what explains the universalism of the Biblical epic. Breaking the cycle that led from exodus back to slavery (or worse) was accomplished through acceptance of the divine laws that elevated the “chosen people” above naturalistic, gene-worshipping, sociobiological determinism. This was the beginning — the creation of a transcendent historical platform from which the final transcendence was anticipated: the coming of the messianic era and the end of the vicious cycles of human history.

While the Jewish yearly calendar is as cyclical as any other, holidays such as Passover celebrate the counter-cycle of the Exodus paradigm. So even as the yearly cycle generates a natural rhythm, annual holidays celebrate the breaking of a natural rhythm. The paradox of a yearly cycle of holidays oriented by the counter-cycle paradigm of Exodus is reflected in the paradox of Jews as biological beings with characteristic postbiological values. The modern idea of revolution, strongly influence by Bible because, was stuck in the same paradox, unable to completely disown biology. For the Hebrew slaves of the Exodus story, a cyclical cosmos implied a repeating pattern of “good and evil” in which one side never ultimately triumphed over the other. The Egyptian cosmos could not account for slaves that escaped the “cosmic” system. But to completely break out of the cyclical conception of the cosmos in the cause of life over death was to posit an end goal of history.

The Exodus paradigm of evil slavery followed by the good of freedom in God would be writ large. A directional conception of history would culminate in the ultimate, messianic triumph of good over evil. Instead of the eternal recurrence of repression, the theory went, the ultimate pattern of human history would begin from the trough of Egyptian slavery and peak with the coming of the messianic era. In this idea, alien to the ancient Greeks but central for seventeenth century Puritans, one can discern the seed of the modern idea of progress. [And the unity of Judaism, Christianity, Puritanism, Progress Ideology, Linear History, Megacidal Marxism, and oncoming Global Apocaplyse (NN)]
...

“Which of us young Jews,” wondered the German Jewish mystic Gershom Scholem in 1915, “has not had the same royal dream and seen himself as Jesus and Messiah of the downtrodden?” This tendency towards messianism, religious or secular, is an expression of a general Jewish collective unconscious. Marx’s proletarian revolution is an imagined or theoretical realization of that same “royal dream” on this earth that a young Jew named Jesus had two thousand years earlier.

According to the American critic and essayist Edmund Wilson:

"The characteristic genius of the Jew has been especially a moral genius....Nobody but a Jew [Marx] could have fought so uncompromisingly and obstinately for the victory of the dispossessed classes."

Marx is probably the most influential modern example of the famous (and infamous) Jewish proclivity for the left-wing socialistic causes. His vision of a communist culmination of human history that resolves the contradictions of the capitalistic world by turning it upside down was nothing less than a nineteenth century updating of the primal archetype of the first revolution: the Mosaic inversion of the Egyptian pyramid-hierarchy.

Marxism could thus be interpreted as a “secularization” of a Biblically-based, messianic Weltanschauung. The issue behind secularization concerns the origin of “modern” values. If reason, in itself, cannot decide fundamental values then so-called “secular” values cannot be fundamentally rational.

The traditional idea of secularization, most strongly associated with Nietzsche, claimed that the modern idea of progress and its egalitarian values were residues of belief in God; Biblical values without Biblical faith. Modern egalitarianism and modern progress, in his view, were secularizations of Biblical values. And at the root of Biblical values was the slave morality that glorified Jewish national political failure.

(Mitchell Heisman, "Suicide Note")

You will have already guessed how easily the priestly way of evaluating can split from the knightly-aristocratic and then continue to develop into its opposite. Such a development receives a special stimulus every time the priestly caste and the warrior caste confront each other jealously and are not willing to agree amongst themselves about the winner. The knightly-aristocratic judgments of value have as their basic assumption a powerful physicality, a blooming, rich, even overflowing health, together with those things required to maintain these qualities—war, adventure, hunting, dancing, war games, and, in general, everything which involves strong, free, happy action. The priestly-noble method of evaluating has, as we saw, other preconditions: these make it difficult enough for them when it comes to war! As is well known, priests are the most evil of enemies—but why? Because they are the most powerless. From their powerlessness, their hate grows among them into something huge and terrifying, to the most spiritual and most poisonous manifestations. The really great haters in world history and the most spiritual haters have always been priests—in comparison with the spirit of priestly revenge all the remaining spirits are generally hardly worth considering. Human history would be a really stupid affair without that spirit which entered it from the powerless. Let us quickly consider the greatest example. Everything on earth which has been done against “the nobility,” “the powerful,” “the masters,” “the possessors of power” is not worth mentioning in comparison with what the Jews have done against them: the Jews, that priestly people, who knew how to get final satisfaction from their enemies and conquerors through a radical transformation of their values, that is, through an act of the most spiritual revenge. This was appropriate only to a priestly people with the most deeply repressed priestly desire for revenge. In opposition to the aristocratic value equations (good = noble = powerful = beautiful = fortunate = loved by god), the Jews, with a consistency inspiring fear, dared to reverse things and to hang on to that with the teeth of the most profound hatred (the hatred of the powerless), that is, to “only those who suffer are good; the poor, the powerless, the low are the only good people; the suffering, those in need, the sick, the ugly are also the only pious people; only they are blessed by God; for them alone there is salvation.—By contrast, you privileged and powerful people, you are for all eternity the evil, the cruel, the lecherous, the insatiable, the godless; you will also be the unblessed, the cursed, and the damned for all eternity!” . . . We know who inherited this Judaic transformation of values . . . In connection with that huge and immeasurably disastrous initiative which the Jews launched with this most fundamental of all declarations of war, I recall the sentence I wrote at another time (in Beyond Good and Evil, section 195)—namely, that with the Jews the slave rebellion in morality begins: that rebellion which has a two-thousand-year-old history behind it and which we nowadays no longer notice because it—has triumphed. . . .*

(HPD Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals)

***********************************[02/03a/11]************************************

[Heisman continues:]

The liberation of women...was a logical extension of Anglo-Saxon rejection of [its] feminine-caste and secondary role. Just as a traditional woman submits to a man in the patriarchal family, Anglo-Saxon ethnic identity submitted for centuries to their Norman masters. Democracy is a form of feminism, a revolution against that Norman-based political patriarchy. The feminism of individual women was implicit from the very beginning in the principles established by America’s Founding Feminists.

The English “class” system originated as a de facto ethnic kinship classification system, and individual feminism continues this same rebellion against a hereditary division of labor - a universalization of the Anglo-Saxon perception of false classification. The Anglo-Saxon male pride that refused to admit the feminine nature of their democracy provided the political ground for individuals of the female sex to reject their own feminine nature. Anglo-Saxon femocrats and individual feminists have converged in the attempt to reject, weaken, or reinterpret the evolutionary origins of sociobiological difference.

Anglo-Saxons are heirs of forefathers who failed in their duty to defend the borders of their gene pool and their native culture. From their forefathers, the Anglo-Saxons inherited the failure to defend the collective integrity of their nation. From partial adaptation to this failure stemmed an Anglo-Saxon tradition of liberal openness that is now the pride of America.

From the American inheritance of the failure of Anglo-Saxon political patriarchy evolved the further deconstruction of familial patriarchy. Liberation of women fulfills Anglo-Saxon loss of sociobiological self-control, which ultimately means loss of control over gene propagation; loss of control over biological evolution itself. But this is comprehensible only to those who do not close their minds to the application of biological evolution to human societies.
...

After allowing...ideas of freedom and equality to unfold for well over two hundred years, Americans have a vested interest in this prestigious pedigree of egalitarianism.

They are politically invested in at least some version of Lockean nurturism, and thus politically invested in the proposition of the fallaciousness of many findings of the science of sociobiology. In consequence, Americans are least free to consider the accuracy of sociobiology in a way that the American founders, at their best, considered the human science of their day. Americans, rather, are the most biased against understanding the evolutionary link between the [Norman] Conquest and the American Revolution. Americans are the most biased because they are living the implications of Anglo-Saxon revulsion towards an unsavory past.

Americans are the most prejudiced towards equality because they possess the greatest vested interest in the political egalitarian status quo. Of this form of invested prejudice against racism and sexism, Americans are perhaps the most prejudiced people on earth.
...

In retrospect, it seems that the goodness of the biological sciences, from a traditional liberal point of view, was directly related to the primitivity of its development. For example, before Darwin and sociobiology, one could reasonably claim that a person who denied the theory of the equality of man was “ignorant”. Now someone who denies the reality of biological differences may themselves be ignorant of the new discoveries of sociobiological science.

The best that can be said of the original liberal theory of the natural equality of man is that it was a pseudoscience. As Francis Fukuyama has pointed out, “there is no necessary correlation between politically incorrect findings and bad science. Attacking the methodological credentials of people whose views one doesn’t like and dismissing their work as “pseudoscience” is a convenient shortcut around arguing over substance.” In this case, dismissing sociobiology as “pseudoscience” exposes how sociobiology has refuted the original theory of human nature that underlies liberal democracy.

The problem, it seems, is not that sociobiology does not make sense. The problem is that sociobiology makes too much sense. Sociobiology is an outlaw science precisely because of its strengths as a science. One could say that anti-sociobiologists must call it pseudoscience, preempting rational discussion, because sociobiology pulls the intellectual foundation of the old liberal arguments from beneath their feet.

Every nation has its founding myth. Presumptions of superiority to biology and its egalitarian corollaries are among the basic myths of America. Bolstered by a priori religious and moral faith, the script for the unfolding of human equality was set in stone from the beginning so that even discoveries that radically refute the idea could not break the egalitarian faith.

While many aspects of liberal humanism may have begun closer to science than religion, the chasm between what is empirically known about human variation and its egalitarian assumptions resembles the chasm between science and other religions. Science and reason were once thought necessary to weaken false political beliefs. It turns out that scientific discoveries such as those underlying human sociobiology must be repressed in order to uphold belief in the egalitarian ideas of the enlightenment. Should scientific knowledge be suppressed for the sake of “enlightened” values?
...

In the twentieth century, the universalistic pretensions of liberal democracy received its greatest political and philosophical challenge from the ethnic cousins of the Anglo-Saxons, the Germans. Just how incompatible these cognate cultures became is empirically evident if we measure the success of each people from the standpoint of genetically adaptive behavior. In general, they went in opposite directions. German-Nazism strived to promote genetically adaptive behavior, while the egalitarian progress of liberal democracy exhibited the Anglo-Saxon genius for genetically maladaptive behavior....It was the Norman Conquest that killed genetically adaptive expressions of national collective life [in England] that survived among the Germans and culminated in Nazism.
...

[Likewise] Jewish self-destruction is a self-realization of Jewish morality; Jewish conscience. The moral worship of powerlessness, taken seriously, leads to biological self-destruction.... Willing powerlessness is the ultimate expression of the Jewish way, the rejection of power in favor of justice. It is to let there be nothing superior in the world; let there be nothing rather than something....[Thus] there is only one way [for Jews] to most fully approach moral self-consistency without hypocrisy and that way is suicide. This is the ultimate logic of Jewish morality. The greatest proof that Judaism has never been consistently egalitarian is the survival of the Jews. [And of the characteristic sanctimonious hypocrisy of the Commie-in-your-land-and-Nazi-in-his-own (NN)]

(Mitchell Heisman, "Suicide Note")

Assuming as true what in any event is taken as “the truth” nowadays, that it is the purpose of all culture simply to breed a tame and civilized animal, a domestic pet, out of the beast of prey “man,” then we would undoubtedly have to consider all those instincts of reaction and ressentiment with whose help the noble races and all their ideals were finally disgraced and overpowered as the essential instruments of culture—though to do that would not be to claim that the bearers of these instincts also in themselves represented culture. By contrast, the opposite would not only be probable—no! nowadays it is visibly apparent! These people carrying instincts of oppression and of a lust for revenge, the descendants of all European and non-European slavery, of all pre-Aryan populations in particular—they represent the regression of mankind! These “instruments of culture” are a disgrace to humanity, and more a reason to be suspicious of or a counterargument against “culture” in general! We may well be right when we hang onto our fear of the blond beast at the base of all noble races and keep up our guard. But who would not find it a hundred times better to fear if he could at the same time be allowed to admire, rather than not fear but in the process no longer be able to rid himself of the disgusting sight of the failures, the stunted, the emaciated, the poisoned? Is not that our fate? Today what is it that constitutes our aversion to “man”?—For we suffer from man. There’s no doubt of that. It’s not a matter of fear. Rather it’s the fact that we have nothing more to fear from man, that the maggot “man” is in the foreground swarming around, that the “tame man,” the hopelessly mediocre and unpleasant man, has already learned to feel that he is the goal, the pinnacle, the meaning of history, “the higher man,”—

Is there anyone who would like to take a little look down on and under that secret how man fabricates an ideal on earth? Who has the courage for that? . . . Come on, now! Here’s an open glimpse into this dark workshop. Just wait a moment, my dear Mr. Nosy and Presumptuous: your eye must first get used to this artificial flickering light. . . . So, enough! Now speak! What’s going on down there? Speak up. Say what you see, man of the most dangerous curiosity—now I’m the one who’s listening.—

—”I see nothing, but I hear all the more. It is a careful, crafty, light rumour-mongering and whispering from every nook and cranny. It seems to me that people are lying; a sugary mildness clings to every sound. Weakness is going to be falsified into something of merit. There’s no doubt about it—things are just as you said they were.”

—Keep talking!

—”And powerlessness which does not retaliate is being falsified into ‘goodness,’ anxious baseness into ‘humility,’ submission before those one hates to ‘obedience’ (of course, obedience to the one who, they say, commands this submission—they call him God). The inoffensiveness of the weak man—cowardice itself, in which he is rich, his standing at the door, his inevitable need to wait around—here acquires a good name, like ‘patience,’ and is called virtue itself. That incapacity for revenge is called the lack of desire for revenge, perhaps even forgiveness (‘for they know not what they do—only we know what they do!’). And people are talking about ‘love for one’s enemies’—and sweating as they say it.”

—Keep talking!

—”They are miserable—there’s no doubt about that—all these rumour-mongers and counterfeiters in the corners, although crouched down beside each other in the warmth—but they are telling me that their misery is God’s choice, His sign. One beats the dog one loves the most. Perhaps this misery may be a preparation, a test, an education, perhaps it is even more—something that will one day be rewarded and paid out with huge interest in gold, no, in happiness. They call that ‘blessedness’.”

—Go on!

—”Now they are letting me know that they are not only better than the powerful, the masters of the earth, whose spit they have to lick (not out of fear, certainly not out of fear, but because God commands that they honour all those in authority)—they are not only better than these, but they also are ‘better off,’ or at any rate will one day have it better. But enough! Enough! I can’t take it any more. Bad air! Bad air! This workshop where man fabricates ideals—it seems to me it stinks of nothing but lies.”

—No! Just one minute more! So far you haven’t said anything about the masterpiece of these black magicians who make whiteness, milk, and innocence out of every blackness:—have you not noticed the perfection of their sophistication, their most daring, most refined, most spiritual, most fallacious artistic attempt? Pay attention! These cellar animals full of vengeance and hatred—what exactly are they making out of that vengeance and hatred? Have you ever heard these words? If you heard only their words, would you suspect that you were completely among men of ressentiment? . . .

—”I understand. Once again I’ll open my ears (oh! oh! oh! and hold my nose). Now I’m hearing for the first time what they’ve been saying so often: ‘We good men—we are the righteous’—what they demand they don’t call repayment but ‘the triumph of righteousness.’ What they hate is not their enemy. No! They hate ‘injustice,’ ‘godlessness.’ What they believe and hope is not a hope for revenge, the intoxication of sweet vengeance (something Homer has already called ‘sweeter than honey’), but the victory of God, the righteous God, over the godless. What remains for them to love on earth is not their brothers in hatred but their ‘brothers in love,’ as they say, all the good and righteous people on the earth.”

—And what do they call what serves them as a consolation for all the suffering of life—their phantasmagoria of future blessedness which they are expecting?

—”What’s that? Am I hearing correctly? They call that ‘the last judgment,’ the coming of their kingdom, the coming of ‘God’s kingdom’— but in the meanwhile they live ‘in faith,’ ‘in love,’ ‘in hope.’”

—Enough! Enough!

(HPD Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals)

************************************[02/03/11]************************************

[Heisman pursues his theme into Old Angleterre:]

The greatest of the Anglo-Saxon revolts began with the murder of the Norman who had been appointed Earl of Northumbria, Robert de Commines. The massacre of Robert and his men on January 28, 1069 was followed by the slaughter of Robert fitzRichard and many of his Norman companions by native forces. In retaliation, William returned from a visit to Normandy, “came upon them by surprise from the south with an overwhelming army, and routed them, and killed those who could not escape, which was many hundreds of men”. Afterwards, he established a new castle to hold York. Yet William’s initial reaction was mild in comparison to [the] ruthless, infamous “harrying of the north” that was to follow. In 1069-70, to ensure that such rebels would never again even think of rising against his authority, the king, “hastening with an angry heart into Northumbria, ceased not, during the whole winter, to lay waste the land, to murder the inhabitants and to inflict numerous injuries”. Once again the English would feel the “fury of the North-men”, or Normans, from these descendants of Vikings. William combed forests and remote mountain places, stopping at nothing to hunt out the enemy hidden there. His camps were spread over an area of 100 miles. He cut down many in his vengeance; destroyed the lairs of others; harried the land and burned homes to ashes. Nowhere else had William shown such cruelty. Shamefully he succumbed to this vice, for he made no effort to restrain his fury and punished the innocent with the guilty. In his anger he commanded that all crops and herds, chattels and food of every kind should be brought together and burned to ashes with consuming fire, so that the whole region north of Humber might be stripped of all means of sustenance. In consequence so serious a scarcity was felt in England, and so terrible a famine fell upon the humble and defenceless populace, that more than 100,000 Christian folk of both sexes, young and old alike, perished of hunger…

With the thoroughness of a civilized berserker, William had “utterly ravaged and laid waste” the shire of York, according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. It and its environs were “destroyed by the French with the sword, famine and flames”. It was said that so many perished that there was no one left to bury the dead and “there was no village inhabited between York and Durham” — the land was left uncultivated for nine years. Historian Dr. Ann Williams concluded that “even by contemporary standards, it was unusually severe”. The “harrying of the north” was state-sanctioned genocide.

William’s lesson that revolt was a crime that would provoke ultimate punishment was a way in which the English learned their “natural” place in the new Norman order. They learned that ‘he was so stern and relentless a man that no one dared to do aught against his will’. This helps explain what ultimately reconciled the English to Norman mastery of their nation: there was nothing they could do about it.
...

The two greatest political upsets in the history of the English-speaking world are hereditarily related to one another. The first is the aristocratic revolution of the Norman Conquest. The second are the democratic revolutions of the ‘Anglo-Saxon conquests’. The latter turning point is a long-term reaction against the former turning point. The parallels between the five years of revolt against the new hereditary government that followed Hastings and the revolt against the old hereditary government by American revolutionaries is not superficial or coincidental: the American Revolution was, in part, a continuation of the struggle against the inheritances of William the Conqueror. If ‘Plan A’ was the revolt during the first five years following the Conquest, then ‘Plan B’ was the revolution in social and political relations that constitutes modern democracy. The revolution of 1776 accomplished, in part, what the Anglo-Saxon revolts of 1066-1071 did not.

Between conquest and revolution was the incubating influence of the “Norman Yoke” that adapted the Anglo-Saxons to the condition of a subpolitical or ‘democratic’ body. 1066 and 1776 are connected by kinship, culture, and a complex process of sociobiological evolution. Without the impetus of 1066, there is no reason to think that modern, revolutionary character of 1776 would have arisen at all.

[From "Historic Faustian Pacts," below:]

*William the Conqueror: His Norman Duchy relies upon a nucleus of three hundred ecclesiastical knights, granted in exchange for administrative and evangelical privileging of local episcopacies. The Conquest of England is otherwise impossible. The "English" crown is thereafter compromised administratively by its premature territorial unity while under ecclesiastically-enforced feudal contracts and later provokes a catastrophic and unsustainable (in terms of an enduring victory) Hundred Years' War over disputed cross-Channel territories. The further maintenance of its primitive and premature administrative structure provokes it to, and dooms it in, a 17th Century Civil War found serviceable by International Jewry.

[Heisman's account, followed into much later pages, provides further evidence of this cynical Faustian alliance:]

A recent biography by David Bates, *William the Conqueror*, described, “a brutal and highly successful opportunist and an outstanding example of an eleventh-century warrior chieftain whose essentially violent life has been given a veneer of legitimacy and respectability by the contemporary churchman who wrote about him.” Since the Pope had blessed this violent political aggression, this made it a Christian duty to uphold the Conquest’s status as a righteous and wholesome activity. It is very clear that William was conscientious about the need for maintaining the appearance of legitimacy. The “holiness” of Conquest also helped assuage the souls of the conquered.

[Continuing the immediate account:]

Many scholars think that the first operation of the Anglo-Saxons in the Varangian Guard [of Constantinople/Byzantium] was against Guiscard’s [Norman] forces in the Balkans [in 1081]. When kinship bonds and circumstantial evidence are taken into account, there is ample reason to believe that the opportunity to “fight a war of vengeance” against the Normans for trampling on a sense of the hereditary rights of Englishmen was an important motivation for their service. Here was the chance, not only avenge the hereditary injustice of the Conquest and to thwart this same pattern-scheme of Norman ambition, but to redeem the Anglo-Saxons from the notion that they were inferior warriors.

At the Battle of Dyrrhachium in 1081, remains of the Anglo-Saxon aristocracy faced off against the self-same Norman race that had humiliated them and their native country. It is possible that some of them had actually fought at Senlac Hill fifteen years before; the ground upon which the Battle of Hastings was fought. Did images of that battle burn through their minds as they prepared for war? British military historian Sir Charles Oman described the conclusion
of this battle in the Balkans:

"A vigorous cavalry charge cut off the greater part of the English: the remainder collected on a little mound by the seashore, surmounted by a deserted chapel. Here they were surrounded by the Normans, and a scene much like that of Senlac, but on a smaller scale, was enacted. After the horsemen and the archers had combined to the destroy the majority of the Varangians, the survivors held out obstinately within the chapel. At last Robert sent for fascines and other woodwork from his camp, heaped them round the building, and set fire to the mass. The English sallied out, to be slain one by one, or perished in the flames. Not a man escaped: the whole corps suffered destruction as a consequence of the their misplaced eagerness to open the fight."

These Anglo-Saxon warriors escaped and survived the cataclysm of 1066 only to be burned alive in what other sources identify as the Church of the Archangel Michael. Does this event capture the true spirit of early Norman “holy war”?

In Sir Charles Oman’s military-historical perspective, these two great Norman victories, Hastings and Dyrrhachium, represented the victory of a progressive “feudalism” over the backwards “old infantry tactics of the Teutonic races….The supremacy of the feudal horseman was finally established.” [A supremacy compacted with, as above, the Whore of Babylon, one of history's two International Harlots - and ultimately paid for with Regicide and Revolution (NN, a descendant of a lieutenant of Rollo the Viking)]

[And the Finale: The Word from Weenie-World:]

Nineteenth century English author George Borrow, for example, described his reaction to a Norman castle in his travelogue Wild Wales. In striking contrast to the sympathetic attitude he displayed towards the other races of Britain that he encountered in his journey, Borrow confessed:

"I…hate and abominate the name of Norman, for I have always associated that name with the deflowering of helpless Englishwomen, the plundering of English homesteads, and the tearing out of poor Englishmen’s eyes. The sight of those edifices, now in ruins, but which were once the strongholds of plunder, violence, and lust, made me almost ashamed of being an Englishman, for they brought to my mind the indignities to which poor English blood has been subjected."

More than the façade of castles, for some it was the Normans themselves and their entire conquering way of life that represented tyranny, aristocracy, and inequality. For some who called themselves “modern”, to oppose the Norman was to advance freedom, democracy, and equality. For some, to oppose the Norman was to oppose the political tradition that began with William the Conqueror, the founding father of the British Empire.

Above all, it was many of the founders of America who understood the Englishmen who had “groaned aloud for their lost liberty and plotted ceaselessly to find some way of shaking off that what was so intolerable”. Their opposition to the British Empire was bred in opposition to William the Conqueror’s founding through the “right of conquest”. As Monty rightly asserted, the political tradition that led to
the conquest of one-third of the globe does, in fact, begin with the act of imperialism known as the Norman Conquest.

[P.S.]

The original aristocratic settlers of Virginia were called
Cavaliers. “[T]he legend of the Virginia cavalier was no mere romantic myth”, concluded David Hackett Fischer in Albion’s Seed. “In all of its major parts, it rested upon a solid foundation of historical fact.”

But who were the Cavaliers?

One year before the outbreak of the American Civil War, in June of 1860, the Southern Literary Messenger declared:

"the Southern people come of that race recognized as cavaliers …directly descended from the Norman barons of William the Conqueror, a race distinguished in its early history for its warlike and fearless character, a race in all times since renowned for its gallantry, chivalry, honor, gentleness and intellect."

*Normans and Saxons: Southern Race Mythology and the Intellectual History of the American Civil War* documented the thesis of Norman/Saxon conflict from a literary perspective. Its author, Ritchie Devon Watson, Jr., interpreted this thesis of Norman-Cavalier identity as “race mythology,” just as historian James McPherson has called this peculiar notion the “central myth of southern ethnic nationalism”. Yet how can this thesis be dismissed as myth without a thorough, scientific, genealogical investigation into the matter? Is it a myth, rather, that the Norman Conquest, the most pivotal event in English history, had no effect whatsoever on America? Is it true that representatives of virtually every ethnicity and race have come to America — with one peculiar Norman exception? Were the descendents of the Norman-Viking conquerors of England the only people in the world who were not enterprising or adventurous enough to try their fortunes in a new land?

“My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union,” Lincoln explained, “and is not either to save or destroy slavery.” Yet it has become commonplace to disagree with Lincoln and to propagate the myth that the Civil War was first and foremost about the slavery of black people. The repeated claim that the Civil War was about slavery can be deceptive because it serves as a means of avoiding focus upon the slavemasters, which further avoids facing the centrality of the identity of the Norman-Cavaliers. The American Civil War was fought primarily, not over black slavery, but over Norman mastery.

(Mitchell Heisman, "Suicide Note")

Let’s look at the facts: the people have triumphed—or ‘the slaves,’ or ‘the rabble,’ or ‘the herd,’ or whatever you want to call them—if this has taken place because of the Jews, then good for them! No people ever had a more world-historical mission. ‘The masters’ have been disposed of. The morality of the common man has won. We may also take this victory as a blood poisoning (it did mix the races up together)—I don’t deny that. But this intoxication has undoubtedly been successful. The ‘Salvation’ of the human race (namely, from ‘the masters’) is well under way. Everything is visibly turning Jewish or Christian or plebeian (what do the words matter!). The progress of this poison through the entire body of humanity seems irresistible, although its tempo and pace may seem from now on constantly slower, more delicate, less audible, more circumspect—well, we have time enough. . .

(HPD Nietzsche, Genealogy of Morals)

In summary of young Heisman's postumous expectations, a "golden mean" of politico-economic establishments has allegedly arrived, world-wide - to be understood by his reader as "capitalism" aka "liberal democracy" and so apparently lifted pre-assembled from the work of Francis Fukuyama (The End of History and the Last Man) and likewise absent an attempt at examination that might have exposed the vacuity of such terminology and the catastrophic consequences of satisfaction with it. This regime is thought, by Heisman, to parallel what he sees as the compromise struck by "Mosaic Law" in the management of the polarities of Hebrew/Jewish behavior with regard to support/subversion of political authority - and is, as well, the technophile framework in which the anticipated Singularity of super-human Artificial Intelligence will one day soon emerge as the "God-AI" implicit in the "postbiological" and "supernatural" formulations of Mosaic Judaism and its teleologically-oriented derivatives: Messianism/Christianity/Puritanism/Progress Ideology/Linear History/Marxism/Liberal Democracy. (One is then puzzled at Heisman's personal suicide in principled pursuit of "objectivity" and philosophical "consistency" in his Jewishness, given the foregoing as his otherwise uncharacteristic self-indulgence in an unexamined fantasy of the oncoming immanentization his own eschaton).

(NeoNietzsche)

************************************[02/01/11]************************************

EGYPT (in prospect):

1) Becomes a “satellite” of Greater Judea, occupied by GJ Janissaries a'la post-war Europe, Korea, and Iraq – and likewise under unifying threat from ideologically antithetical elements (Communist vs Europe+Korea and Islamic vs Iraq), either foreign or domestic – amidst yet another displacement of open authoritarianism by a veiled client plutocracy that can survive only thus.

2) Eventually becomes an Islamic theocracy, a'la Iran, for failure of Greater Judea to enforce the only alternative, as above, amidst quixotic and fatuous efforts to durably install that pretense of popular sovereignty sanctimoniously invoked as "democracy".

3) Alternates between the two, above, a'la post-Revolutionary France or a South American "banana republic". Manages to ignite WWIII during an episode of (2), above, by attacking Lesser Judea in terminal desperation amidst its oncoming rotational displacement by (1), above.

[4] Would it not be a supreme irony - or propriety - if Egypt, arguably the locale of the origination of ordered existence on the planet, were to be the flash point, as depicted in (3), above, of the termination of ordered existence on the planet?

************************************[01/23b/11]***********************************

Barrie the Red is an "anti-colonialist" (now that there are no more "Marxist-Leninists" following "Communism's" mysterious semantic disappearance from the planet amidst it's global march to victory as properly understood).

************************************[01/23a/11]***********************************

Wouldn't it be a peerless irony, were the RusComs and ChiComs now the ones keeping the national/cultural resistance going in Afghanistan?

************************************[01/23/11]************************************

Who needs Lockheed's?

************************************[01/18/11]************************************

Like I was saying...

************************************[11/14/10]************************************

Incidentally, as for the significance of the election, diddly squat. The far more important news is that Bernanke is indeed going to engage in more “quantitative easing” aka monetizing of the debt. ("Rollory"@MR)

Even the latter is of little consequence, since it merely injects debt-burdened money into financial market circulation, thus [ceteris paribus] slightly lowering effective interest rates and making equity instruments more attractive. [As it happened, wrongly-conceived fears of inflation boosted interest rates in the immediate aftermath, since a permanent rather than a temporary reflation was mis-taken as the intention and effect of the Fed's action (whereas the Fed's debt-money always ultimately deflates what it inflates), thus producing the unintended effect on rates merely psycho-somatically, so to speak, contrary to the actual material effect.]

Rather, the authentic and effective measure in reflation of the commercial economy (debt-free fiscal stimulus) is not being adopted, and so another inconsequential pageant passes into history amidst much serious comment and deliberation by those many who have bought into/been fooled by the apparent instantiation of Fukuyama's "post-modernist" notion of the universality of (vaguely-defined and unrationalized) "liberal-democracy" as a politico-economic end-state for global humanity.

************************************[10/23/10]************************************

Israel has sold advanced weapons systems to China that are believed to incorporate technology developed by American companies, including the [Israeli] Python-3 air-to-air missile and the Delilah cruise missile. There is evidence that Israel has also stolen Patriot missile avionics to incorporate into its own Arrow system and that it used US technology obtained in its Lavi fighter development program, which was funded by the US taxpayer to the tune of $1.5 billion, to help the Chinese develop their own J-10 fighter.

The reality of Israeli spying is indisputable. Israel always features prominently in the annual FBI report called "Foreign Economic Collection and Industrial Espionage." The 2005 report states, "Israel has an active program to gather proprietary information within the United States. These collection activities are primarily directed at obtaining information on military systems and advanced computing applications that can be used in Israel’s sizable armaments industry." It adds that Israel recruits spies, uses electronic methods, and carries out computer intrusion to gain the information. The 2005 report concluded that the thefts eroded US military advantage, enabling foreign powers to obtain expensive technologies that had taken years to develop.

...

In June 2006, a Pentagon administrative judge overruled an appeal by an Israeli who had been denied a security clearance, stating, "The Israeli government is actively engaged in military and industrial espionage in the United States. An Israeli citizen working in the US who has access to proprietary information is likely to be a target of such espionage." More recently, FBI counter intelligence officer John Cole has reported how many cases of Israeli espionage are dropped under orders from the Justice Department. He provides a "conservative estimate" of 125 worthwhile investigations into Israeli espionage involving both American citizens and Israelis that were stopped due to political pressure from above.

http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2010/01/27/stealing-success-tel-aviv-style/

-----------------------------------------------

Pollard did more damage to the United States than any spy in history. And it was genuine damage, not just a mass of documents that had been routinely classified. Pollard’s Israeli handler, aided by someone in the White House who has up until now evaded arrest, was able to ask for specific classified documents by name and number. The Soviets obtained US war plans, passed to them by the Israelis in exchange for money and free emigration of Russian Jews without any regard for the damage it was doing to the United States. The KGB was able to use the mass of information to reconstruct US intelligence operations directed against it and a number of Americans and US agents paid with their lives. Pollard also revealed to the Israelis and Soviets the technical and human source capabilities that US intelligence did and did not have, which is the most critical information of all as it underlies all information collection efforts. Compounding the problem, the United States has never actually been able to accurately ascertain all of the damage done by Pollard because the Israeli government has refused to cooperate in the investigation and has not returned the documents that were stolen.

http://original.antiwar.com/giraldi/2010/09/29/wake-up-america/

************************************[10/19/10]************************************

Before any of us were born – 1913 in the United States and a long time before that in the UK – the governments of the “Free World” allowed a cartel of bankers to hijack our financial system. Instead of the Treasury minting coin and printing notes, and creating credit for public works to spend into circulation debt-free, the cartel would create the credit and sell it to our respective governments at interest. When credit is created at interest it is by definition irredeemable, so our governments would periodically renew these loans by returning cap in hand to their masters. As long ago as September 1921 the following was directed at the Lloyd George Government: “Does he, and do his colleagues, realise that half a dozen men at the top of the five big banks could upset the whole fabric of Government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury bills?”.

************************************[10/16/10]************************************

[@PF@MR:]

Thank you for your preliminary thoughts.

I hope we would agree that the essential challenge is not, however, refining our grasp of the notion of objectivity [for the sake of an objectively-derived evaluative framework] - rather, that our terrible task is deriving the subjective from the objective - that of deriving generally-agreed-upon societal values from mere facts about society or nature in general.

The Left has been able to exploit this obstacle to ordered existence because of a foundational flaw in the present regime. The pretense of which I have written in discussing LAW, ETHICS, MORALITY is the product of the doomed attempt to create, or to pretend the existence of, a cosmopolitan society (an oxymoronic phrase, in fact) - on this continent, in particular, and in the West, in general - in alignment with the notion of having attempted or established a durably tribeless “propositional nation” (another oxymoron) that ought to be emulated by, or imposed upon, the rest of the world.

We find to our misfortune that bourgeois society, to the extent that it has an ideological rationale and a pattern of behavior, is already intrinsically cosmopolitan and propositional - all are welcome to enter and to do business in the great shopping mall that is the occupying regime. Everything is for sale - land, labor and capital are all alienable and/or migrant. But the great shopping mall is thus intrinsically subject to domestic and global class warfare, and cannot long endure in necessary reliance upon a consistent and complete formulation of commercial and property law/ethics/morality that does not (and, I submit, cannot) exist. The immediate implication of this impasse is violent conflict and the dissolution of the ersatz “society” - not merely out of distaste for it as such, as present company would “evaluate” it - but simply out of the logic of political economy as confirmed by the repetitive history thereof.

Hence the challenge to provision of a framework for societal values in which general acquiescence can be expected amongst people of increasingly diverse and alienated backgrounds. I submit that strictly objective criteria do not exist therefor, hence the success of the subversive Leftist agenda. The traditional answer to this difficulty has been Mastery of the Lie through priestcraft, and collaterally the forceful stratification of society by armed men who are, or are the descendants of, those of us who are inclined to a violent dominance hierarchy and so are naturally given to the formation of an army pursuing organized conquest, systematic exploitation, and societal stratification (i.e., the enforced domestication/civilization to which the cosmetics and palliatives of the priesthood are applied). As it happens, the Master of the Lie presently governs Greater Judea with an elaborate web of material misrepresentations, past which we of present company are able to see, but we are yet sadly at a loss for a forward-looking and workable alternative that is, in sufficient measure, the implication of the requisite “objective” observations about the nature of human society.

************************************[10/13/10]************************************

According to Trainspotter, “White Nationalist intellectuals” are absolutely sacrosanct and off limits to criticism. We should all be “spreading ideas” such as this. That’s the most important thing we can do. Organizing a power base in the real world is a waste of time.

In his worldview, Soren Renner and Constantin von Hoffmeister are more important than, say, David Duke almost becoming Governor of Louisiana. I completely disagree with that perspective.

The tension between “White Nationalist intellectuals” and the “mainstreaming” approach is obvious. The former deliberately marginalize themselves by entertaining esoteric ideas. ("Hunter Wallace"@OD)

But elites govern in the context, and under the influence of what, to the masses, are marginal ideas.

So, my sense of what remains of our infinitesimal prospects for survival is directed toward expanding the division between the main elements of the elite – alternatively: New-Order Globalist Judeo-Communism and Kosher-Con Judeo-Fascism (as forwarded by the presently loyal Janissary forces of the Greater Judean Oligarchy).

This involves concentration on what I refer to as “ethicism” – as opposed to racism – wherein I make the point that the anticipated Talmudic Eschaton will bring the Temple down on all our heads, Jew and Gentile alike. The present course of the globe is toward world-wide anarchy – and toward the reduction of whatever of humanity that survives in that state of nature to the world depicted in the aftermath films of the present day.

************************************[10/11a/10]***********************************

NIETZSCHE AND THE DOMINATION OF THE DRAKA

(Steve Stirling tap dances in an ideological minefield)

************************************[10/10/10]************************************

[From the OPEN YOUR MOUTH AND REMOVE ALL DOUBT file:]

The Israeli cabinet today approved a bill requiring new non-Jewish citizens to swear an oath of allegiance to Israel as a “Jewish and democratic state”, in a move that has brought accusations of discrimination against Israel’s Arab minority. One dissenting cabinet minister referred to a “whiff of fascism”.

...

Writing in today’s Haaretz, liberal commentator Gideon Levy said: “Remember this day. It’s the day Israel changes its character ... From now on, we will be living in a new, officially approved, ethnocratic, theocratic, nationalistic and racist country.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/10/israel-jewish-oath-new-citizens

************************************[10/02/10]************************************

[From the DAILY DOINGS IN GREATER JUDEA file:]

CNN's Sanchez fired after calling Stewart a bigot
By DAVID BAUDER

Sanchez dismisses it when Dominick points out that Stewart, who is Jewish, is also a minority.

"I'm telling you that everyone who runs CNN is a lot like Stewart, and a lot of people who run all the other networks are a lot like Stewart, and to imply that somehow they, the people in this country who are Jewish, are an oppressed minority?" Sanchez said, adding a sarcastic "yeah."

"I can't see someone not getting a job these days because they're Jewish," he said.

CNN issued a statement late Friday that said Sanchez "is no longer with the company." In it, the network also thanked Sanchez "for his years of service" and wished him well.

************************************[08/28/10]************************************

Oliver Stone lately expands the ranks of the disgraced culturati who cannot perpetually hold their tongues and noses in the presence of the stinking pachyderm taking up the room. So the obligatory apology and self-abasement ritual, for failing to maintain pious pretenses, has been performed by yet another wretched offender, now forever marked.

************************************[07/17/10]************************************

[Dialogue taken from the film, The International]

It's about control...the IBBC is a bank - their objective...is to control the debt that the [armed] conflict produces. You see, the real value of a conflict - the true value - is in the debt that it creates. [If] you control the debt - you control everything!

...this is the very essence of the banking industry: to make us all, whether we be nations or individuals, slaves to debt.

************************************[07/10/10]************************************

[From The Atlantic, June 2010, "The Enemy Within," by Mark Bowden:]

"When the Conficker computer 'worm' was unleashed on the world in November 2008, cyber-security experts didn't know what to make of it. It infiltrated millions of computers around the globe. It uses an encryption code so sophisticated that only a very few people could have deployed it. For the first time ever, the cyber-security elites of the world have joined forces in a high-tech game of cops and robbers, trying to find Conficker's creators and defeat them. The cops are failing. And now the worm lies there, waiting...
...

"We're dealing with one of two things: either we're dealing with incredibly sophisticated cyber criminals, or we're dealing with a group that was funded by a nation-state.
...

"You know you're dealing with someone who not only knows how botnets work, but who understands how the security community works...This is not just a bunch of organized criminals that, say, commission someone to write a botnet for them. They know the challenges that the security community faces internally, politically, and economically, and are exploiting them as well.
...

"One of the early clues in the hunt was the peculiarity in the Conficker code that made computers with active Ukrainian keyboards immune."

************************************[07/08/10]************************************

[Grimoire:] While not the topic on which I wish to confer with you, I should like to commend you [NN] on the exactness of your prescience:

---------------------
[Wiki:] Just like your uncle Fred, you’re keen to philosophize with a hammer but incapable of offering a coherent vision for a future direction.

[NN:] I recognize and have explained a high-altitude ballistic trajectory of events. You merely presume that they can be deflected - somehow. You thus fail to grasp that one cannot “offer a coherent vision for a future direction”. The “future” was launched, long ago. Read your own Book as to forebodings of an eventual Apocalypse. Evidently you do not recognize all the eschatology of the Zeitgeist as symptomatic of self-recognition. [See the films, "The Road" and "The Book of Eli" for the latest and most graphic/extreme examples.]
------------------------

[Grimoire:] Precisely - just so.

There is implicit irony, or humour, in a situation where the many lesser lights plead for plans, theorems and solutions, however banal, however stupid, as preferable to a clear look into the abyss.

A situation similar to ‘hiding in plain sight’. There is a clinical term for this - cognitive dissonance, or perceptual disorder. It is a disease that, while highly contagious, is initially voluntary.

The disorder has been deliberately cultivated - most can only function comfortably under it’s influence - discomforted only if symptoms wane... it is the active spirochete in the blood of the nationalist movements of the anglosphere.

************************************[07/06/10]************************************

...there are geopolitical reasons which have little to do with race that make it likely that the US and its allies will come into conflict with China and/or Russia this century. What is shaping up is really more of a global class war than the race war envisioned by the hardline racialist set. I can’t even predict tomorrow’s weather so I won’t tell you what form this conflict will take but the world is a dangerous place and it doesn’t do to discount the possibility for a catastrophe, even another world war. Especially since the general trend since the last two has been, globally, degeneration away from order and into anarchy.

("Norbert H." @ Accidental Dissent)

************************************[03/11/10]***********************************

I’ve got to agree with the statement that NN made:

“Amidst coming global catastrophe, mid-century, whatever is left of the military will inevitably assume command of the situation - for good or ill. Satan is on his way to collect his due for WWII, after a century of party-time for the conniving and back-stabbing Anglo-Americans. Indeed, the ghost of Hua Guofeng whispers to us his cautionary tale, from the shadows around us into which we do not see.”

This must be the best thing I’ve ever seen NN write.

("Denise" @ OD)

************************************[03/10/10]***********************************

[NN's "Exterior Ballistics"] is excellent. The bill will come due for America’s past indiscretions, probably in the lifetime of most people here. Also, he’s absolutely right that, at this juncture, democratic populism is useless. When your enemy has command of all the institutions, money, media, and force, it’s impossible to counteract them with democratic action. The elites could quickly diffuse that, one way or another.

("Kasimir Petrenko" @ OD)

************************************[03/09/10]***********************************

NN reminds me of the quote from The Departed: “Staff Sergeant Dignam has a style of his own. I’m afraid we all have to get used to it.” But his constant admonitions to see reality as it is are useful to help avoid the ideological pissing contests of this ideology vs. that ideology. (He might call that arguing over form-of-government.)

("See Something Say Something" @ OD)

************************************[03/08/10]***********************************

The Oligarchs who were purged were the most egregious cases, i.e., he [Putin] probably had to do that to look good. ("Kasimir Petrenko" @OD)

Precisely. The hard Marxist lesson as to the Oligarchic Evils of Capitalism had been well-laid-on the bared backs of the Russian people. It was time to cleanse the regime of the cruel slave-masters and their exploitative “form-of-government”. And time to cut the people down from the imported Western whipping post - once again to heal a long-suffering people, pro tempore, in a crypto-anarchist Communist ward sporting the facade of a statist Socialist hospital.

************************************[02/28/10]************************************

The USA, Great Britain, Germany, Australia and other White countries are now under the firm control of Zionist Jews and their lackeys. Christian Whites are now powerless, both economically and politically. The AIPAC now owns the US Congress, and it makes sure that US taxpayers send billions of dollars yearly to their beloved Israel while these same taxpayers are having their homes foreclosed. US cities, counties, and states are going bankrupt while US soldiers are spilling their blood in Islamic countries on behalf of Zionist Israel. While the US military is busy in Iraq, Afghanistan, and soon, in Iran - Mexico, Venezuela, Bolivia, Argentina, Cuba and other Latin American countries are forming powerful alliances, as occurred in Cancun, Mexico, this past week.

This, in addition to powerful alliances with Islam and Russia, by Latin America, spells very bad news for the USA indeed. When the economy collapses, Whites will not just be battling “mestizos.” Remember, there is a very vulnerable 2000 mile border with Mexico and Latin America beyond. Like President Hugo Chavez Frias of Venezuela said, “The death of the USA Empire is at hand!”

(Quoted by "Kievsky" @ OD)

************************************[02/27/10]************************************

Anyone who accepts uncritically, and who regurgitates approvingly, the hagiography of men like FDR and Churchill, and who mindlessly repeats the court historian’s lies about WWI and WWII, and who touts the entire Anglo-American historical mythos as though it were self-evidently true, is an enemy (or at least too seriously deluded to be a friend or ally) and is part of the problem, not part of the solution.

It’s one thing to say that the Nazi-cultism is unhelpful to our cause and that “blame-the-Jews-for-everything” mentality that finds a Jew under every bed, is not going to help us much in solving our ultimate problems. This is true. Most of us here would agree with that.

It’s quite another thing entirely to then go on to say, that because of this, we have to appeal to the ignorance of the masses by pretending that the lies of the official court historians are true, and that we must denounce anyone who disagrees with these historical lies as “Nazis”, “Hitler worshippers”, etc.

There’s a middle way in which we can avoid such pointless things as Hollywood Nazi uniform fetishes, without however accepting the anti-Nazi lies we have been force fed by the media and academia. People need to be educated as to the facts, otherwise the “solutions” they will attempt to implement will be based on false assumptions about the facts, and thus, will repeatedly fail and come to naught.

Some put themselves in an entirely ridiculous bind: he wants to accept the Anglo-American-Jewish worldview about the history of the 20th century, and yet also claim to recognize the Jews as incompatible with Western culture, and thus in need of removal from our midst.

That’s absurd. Why are the Jews incompatible? You can’t just criticize Jewish behaviour internally (that is, their bad influence on our culture) without also taking note of their disastrous influence over our foreign policy. It’s too absurd for words. WNs either have to come on board all the way, take the red pill, and recognize reality for what it is, or they have to make their peace with the Jews and take the blue pill, and get on with his life as a willing tool of the System.

This is one instance where there is no third way, where People simply can’t hedge, niggle, wiggle, or finagle their way out of this dilemma. Sometimes there is a third way, sometimes there are more than two choices, where saying there are only two choices constitutes a “false dichotomy”; but this is not one of them. It’s either the red pill or the blue pill, folks; no other choices.

("Friedrich Braun" @ "Majority Rights")

************************************[02/15/10]************************************

NN, I recently found your blog and have benefited from the content thus far. I am new to Nietzsche, having concentrated primarily on epistemological thought, but I like what I know of his thoughts on morality. I've read This Spoke Zarathustra and was wondering if you might recommend what I should read of Nietzsche next?

*GENEALOGY OF MORALS*

The "Touchstone" of his philosophy.

************************************[02/14/10]************************************

God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong, God chose what is low and despised in the world, even things that are not, to bring to nothing things that are. (1 Cor 1:27-28).

************************************[02/04b/10]***********************************

"I’m sick of many WNs complicating things by dragging in anti-Christianity, National Socialism, Neopaganism, obscure European intellectuals, anti-Republicanism, anti-Capitalism, Third Reich daydreaming etc.

Keep it simple but not too simple. American, Christian (at least not anti-Christian), family values– give us back our White Christian Republic! - ski"

Let me put it this way, and I’ll try to be as polite as possible: A large number of White racialists do not want to live in a White Christian Republic; I and many others would be in fact willing to fight not to. Religious beliefs ought to be kept to the private sphere, regression to the days of Christian hegemony is just as undesirable as the current situation in my opinion. ("Kasimir Petrenko" @ OD)

[NN concurs:]

The one virtue of the present dispensation, from my purely selfish point of view, is that William Jennings Bryan and his numbskull Populists were interdicted, by international Jewry, in their movement toward the Christian theocratization of the continent.

There's no surprise in that historic development, of course, since childish Whites seem to be able to commune in little other than one or another version of slave morality, thus requiring one or another version of alien mastery to maintain order amongst themselves.

But the world *would* have been much better off, following those days, if the Isolationists had then been allowed, by a Populist regime, to keep the country out of the Jews' slyly-engineered World War to Save Communism.

However, that redemptive opportunity is long lost, never to be recovered - and a world-sparing remission of a metatasizing Greater Judea can no longer be effected - by erecting an insufferable Thumpers' regime on the suffrage of a mass of delusional pro-Zionist goyim.

************************************[02/04/10]************************************

[Mark I responds to our STFTD of 02/01/10:]

Unlike most of the Amurricans over at Occidental Dissent, I have spoken with Russian nationalists and can say with 100% certainty that they have imperial designs. What's more the most intelligent ones are not sympathetic to communistic Jewry though they are aware that their gov't is currently controlled by the same. They wouldn't get into specifics but I've the idea that they intend to change that, perhaps with an NS style construct of their own as was hinted.

What will happen in the coming years is anyone's guess but even if war is "unthinkable" now, Europe's half-century long divorce from reality will likely come to a violent end and sooner than most people surmise.

************************************[02/02/10]************************************

Cattle consigned to an abattoir understandably do not care to have their circumstance explained to them.

************************************[02/01/10]************************************

War on the pacified European continent is now almost unthinkable. No one in Western Europe lives in fear of Russian tanks anymore. ("Hunter Wallace" @ OD)

Nor did anyone before WWII.

Guderian, after a visit east, told Hitler that the Soviets had 10,000 AFV (they had produced 24,000).

Hitler didn't believe even the lower number (Germany had 3000).

But strategic deception, systematically pursued since mid-century-last, has indeed "pacified" the continent and made war "almost unthinkable".

Students of World History recognize the pattern.

************************************[01/14/09]************************************

"When the soldiers of the tenth legion at Rome demanded their discharge and rewards for their service, with violent threats and no small danger to the city, although the war was then raging in Africa, he did not hesitate, contrary to the advice of his friends, to meet the legion, and disband it. But addressing them by the title of "Quirites," instead of "Soldiers," he by this single word so thoroughly brought them round and changed their determination, that they immediately cried out they were his "soldiers," and followed him to Africa, although he had refused their service."

************************************[01/04/10]************************************

@Notuswind,

If you [NN] don't mind me asking, how did you come to develop such an interest in this subject? Were you once a PhD student in physics (or possibly an assistant professor of the same)? In our exchange at OD I was able to gather that you've had at least some contact with the academic world on these matters.

My pleasure to introduce you to this area of controversy.

I was first so involved, in high school (in the 60's), when encountering popular discussions of Special Relativity in terms of the simple "Thought Experiments". I was not troubled by empirical considerations, but rather by the seeming lack of internal logic to the reciprocal experience of relativistic effects (Special Principle of SR) if a light-conducting medium/framework (of, admittedly, indeterminate relative position) is not implicit in the concept. I again invite you to test this for yourself, as it requires nothing beyond a layman's equipment to engage it - and it may arouse suspicions in your own mind as to the soundness/meaningfulness of the proclamations of mainstream physicists regarding the foundations of their discipline.

My interest in the area, in general terms, arises from my interest in having a foundation of knowledge of fundamentals in *all* the academic disciplines, natural and social: physics/chemistry/biology/zoology/psychology/sociology/political-science/economics/history/anthropology/natural history/geography/geology/astronomy/cosmology. Since controversy arises in all of these areas, epistemology and philosophy also were needed. And I put all of this together in what I call "civilization science" - a refined version of Spenglerian notions. The "Faustian Pact" pattern of *Abendlandes* cultural pathology came out of this theorizing, somewhat as did Yockey's relatively superficial concept (in *Imperium*) of "Culture Distortion". The "logic and history of political economy," to which I often refer, also was a product of this synthesis and led to the recognition of the FP pattern, with which I was able to dazzle a grad-school Medieval History prof. in a proposal and a paper that first predicted and then explored my subsequent discovery of an unfamiliar expression of this general pattern in the comparative-history literature concerning Medieval European and Asian history and culture.

I did an undergrad degree in History and went directly into a Ph.D program, on Fellowship, studying in the History of Science. I was going to do my dissertation on the problems in SR that I've mentioned. But Einstein is a Saint, the history prof's had no idea what I was talking about, the physics prof. responsible for the subject was not troubled by the problem, my advisor was a pomo, I wasn't deeply interested in anything else in the H. of S. - so I quit and went into business. But the issue hangs, and the White-wing would like to exploit it by attacking Einstein as a mere plagiarist and a totem created of Jewish propaganda. I just want to resolve the matter in terms of logical and meaningful concepts, and I can't escape noticing it, since its difficulties (in either SR or GR form) emerge from any discussion of physical and cosmological fundamentals.

Let me hear, please, of your further investigation. I've been bragging on you as our Hope.

NN

************************************[01/04/10]************************************

@notuswind,

To be frank, the problem of assessing the true nature of the various theoretical pieces that constitute the standard model is a very difficult one indeed.

Indeed. I [NN] presume that you write of the “standard model” as the general assembly of theories QM/GR/BB, rather than the specific “Standard Model” of particle physics - which model resists integration with GR in its spectacular discrepancy with observed reality when its [SM] calculations of vacuum energy density are incorporated into GR. Something like 120 orders of magnitude?

Of course GR is treated like scripture and the attempt to deal with this embarrassment always comes at the expense of the SM. I seem to recall that Zeldovich tried to get the Vacuum Energy to “leak” away into “other universes,” many years ago - and the peerlessly gigantic problem still sits there, as far as I know. It’s bizarre and seemingly interminable, and I hope that you will dive in at this angle, to start. Prof. Larry Abbott, then of Brandeis U., contributed an article to Scientific American, years ago, entitled, “The Mystery of the Cosmological Constant”. Enjoy.

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988SciAm.258..106A

http://www.cellularuniverse.org/MysteriesParadoxes.htm#Mystery%20of%20the%20Cosmological%20Constant

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/24844

************************************[12/26/09]************************************

Let us hope and pray that WE TODAY in the West hopefully see through the lies and deceits of Mystery Babylon, and her horrid, poverty-inducing *Debt-Usury* system .. a system which strangles the lifeblood of nations and peoples and puts them on an inevitable road to perpetual conflict and war … mendaciously disguised as a road to ‘prosperity’ and perpetual ‘peace’!

("Kulaks Never Learn" @ OD)

************************************[12/19b/09]***********************************

In the ethic of "Good And Bad," what is the worst?

The ignoble Lie that appeals to the most.

************************************[12/19/09]************************************

[Mark IJsseldijk takes admirable issue with our 'Tards re NeoNietzsche and "Superhuman":]

I am in self-imposed exile because of my boorish actions and disgust in general with the "movement." But forget that. You used Stronza and my comments to great effect in making your own points. I find your interpretations very accurate. Don't abandon your blog, please, it is a ray of light in a dark time.

**********************************[12/08b/09]***********************************

The Good Little Goy's Loyalty Oath

(to the meter of the Apostle's Creed):

I believe in Jewry, Chosen of God, makers of Mythical Money and Media Monopoly,

And in Greater Judea, once America, now their Cattle Ranch.

Which was surrendered to their manipulation, subjected to their governance, driven to the destruction of their enemies - and was negrified, judaized, and feminized.

It descended into hell.

Never to rise again as the land of its Founders.

Thus Greater Judea ascended to Global Supremacy, sitting at the right hand of the megacidal Soviet Monstrosity,

With which it rendered Soviet-style, show-trial justice on the enemies of Judeo-Communism.

I believe in the Holy Holocaust,

The Holy State of Israel,

The Sacred Six Million,

The Diabolization of Hitler,

The Hollywood History of the Second World War,

And the everlasting pursuit of Nazis.

Amen.

************************************[12/08a/09]**********************************

["Denise" writes, at Occidental Dissent:]

Mainstreamers - as Hunter has brilliantly detailed - all you’ve done, for decades, is is yield ground to the Jew-owned Left. So CHOKE on your canapes, and cocktails, why don’t you? I name the Jew, and DEFEND the Nazis, TO Mainstream Whites all the time. I make a CASE for what I say. And the KIKE bank-robbing plunderers (don’t you DARE censor that word) in and around Wall Street, have aided me far more than any of you effete manicured pragmatist eun[u]chs.

[NN comments:]

One would hope that your bracing words might prompt our effete manicured pragmatist eunuchs into racially productive activity.

However, you will need to be qualified as to your background and character before your counsel can be seriously considered by said eunuchs.

So - are you now, or have you ever been:

1) …a “loser”?
2) …unappealing to the opposite sex?
3) …otherwise sexually dysfunctional?
4) …the product of a less-than-elite educational institution?
5) …compensating for feelings of personal inferiority?
6) …proud of the sacred symbols of the race and to be publicly associated therewith?
7) …contemptuous of the dignified and efficient conduct of racial confrontation as confined to modern electronic devices?

If your answer to any of the above is in the affirmative, the eunuchs are excused from attention to your remarks. Sorry.

************************************[12/08/09]************************************

[The Three-Factorial Question :]

MILITARY -- MEDIA -- MONEY?

MONEY -- MILITARY -- MEDIA?

MEDIA -- MONEY -- MILITARY?

MEDIA -- MILITARY -- MONEY?

MONEY -- MEDIA -- MILITARY?

MILITARY -- MONEY -- MEDIA?

************************************[11/30/09]************************************

"You [white people] don't want to be *me* - and *I'm* RICH"

(Chris Rock)

************************************[11/27/09]************************************

Power struggle behind revival of Maoism

By Willy Lam

As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership tries to convince United States President Barack Obama and other world leaders that China is eagerly integrating itself with the global marketplace, the ultra-conservative norms and worldview of Chairman Mao Zedong are making a big comeback in public life.

In provinces and cities that foreign dignitaries are unlikely to visit, vintage Cultural Revolution-era (1966-1976) totems are proliferating. In Chongqing, a mega-city of 32 million people in western China, Mao sculptures - which were feverishly demolished soon after the late patriarch Deng Xiaoping catalyzed the reform era in 1978 - are being erected throughout government offices, factories and universities.

...

The other two dimensions of the Maoist revival portend struggles and changes within the CCP; it is emblematic of the CCP's shift to the left, as well as the intensification of political infighting among the party's disparate factions (in China, "leftism" denotes doctrinaire socialist values, emphasis on the party's monopoly on power, and a move away from the free-market precepts).

It is well known that since the Tibet riots in March 2008, the CCP leadership has tightened the noose around the nation's dissidents as well as activists of non-governmental agencies. Yet in the wake of the international financial meltdown, economic policy has also displayed anti-market tendencies, if not also a re-assumption of values such as state guidance of the economy, which were observed during the long reign of the revered chairman.

This is evidenced by the phenomenon called *guojin mintui*, or state-controlled enterprises advancing at the expense of the private sector. In areas ranging from coal and steel to transportation, state-controlled firms are swallowing up private companies. Moreover, government-run outfits are the major beneficiaries of the $585 million stimulus package announced late last year, as well as the $1.1 trillion worth of loans extended by Chinese banks in the first three quarters of the year.

Even more significant is the fact that a number of party cadres are invoking Maoist values including radical egalitarianism when formulating public policies. While Mao was said to have ushered in the new China by pulling down the "three big mountains" of feudalism, bureaucratic capitalism and imperialism, his latter-day followers are engaged in an equally epic struggle against the "three new mountains", a reference to runaway prices in the medical, education and housing sectors.

Nowhere is this ethos more pronounced than in Chongqing, whose leadership has vowed to develop so-called "red GDP". This is a codeword for economic development that is geared toward the needs of the masses - and not dictated by the greed of privileged classes such as the country's estimated 30 million millionaires....

http://atimes.com/atimes/China/KK24Ad01.html

************************************[11/25a/09]**********************************

[The latest from the 'TARDS ON PARADE file:]

Evil white men like them [NeoNietzsche and Curious Vojtech], assuming they are white, are spiritual jews and in a white ethnostate they will be treated the way the Inquisition, peace be upon it, treated heretics.

Burned alive in the public square as an example to others. ("OldRight")

************************************[11/25/09]************************************

["Curious Vojtech" addresses the attentive at OD:]

“Jews are grown-ups and Whites are children. Is it any wonder who must govern and who must submit?” (NeoNietzsche)

NN of course states the truth. The lack of realistic insight or self awareness is endemic in these circles of twelve or fifteen. You - we - are pwned like no people have ever been in the history of the world. There is no uniting language, history, culture, outlook - no shared past (unless we count our vaunted forest days), thus no future. Every job we do, every Euro we spend, every breath we take, benefits our masters. Our money is owned, our livelihood is owned, and it makes no difference if you’re a billionaire or laying low on the dole, we’re all little lonesome things scrabbling around the Occident beneath the sometime gaze of those who worked long and hard to fuse themselves into an organism. Jews made themselves. Remember that. We just happened. There can be beauty in sheer natural selection, but it won’t cut it when the robot comes pounding through.

There is no politics to yank us out, no matter if we slave in Kwa or Albion or the graveyard of Germany or that mighty hope Russia, with its whores and orphans and junkies. Politics in a democratic plutocracy don’t mean dick. Lowly heilôtai back in the day had more than us - at least they could acknowledge the degree of their bondage. A gaggle of frustrated men writing in a language that tribes in Nigeria are taught, on a medium that can be accessed by fourth graders, is not going to change the world or their own situation, no matter how many books they’ve read or historical insights gained.

It’s nice to see NN writing like a man. It’s rare in our long “Western” culture, where there’s so much of Jebu this and morals that and talk of heaven and soul and rights and those dang-blamed Jews with their lack of morality (fist shake), blah blah. From our dipshit fairytales to our stupid women to our automatic killing of whoever we’re told to kill, from our Benny Hinn conferences to our lousy diets to our debating angels and their pin dances, the writing’s been on the wall for a long time - we’re marked for extinction.

“NeoNietzsche and Curious Vojtech boast of their utter lack of morality, and jeer and gloat at the foolishness of anyone raising moral issues in the cultural war between jews and mankind, yet at no time in the history of cultural warfare has any side won that declared itself immoral or amoral.” (OldRight)

What a weird thing to say. Just because someone doesn’t share a pathetic slave morality doesn’t mean they “lack” morals, even though muddled types will always think that. I see lots of moral “whites” (um, “Whites”) all around me, adopting Korean castoffs, sniffing out racism, killing Pashtuns, setting up Nativity scenes on their overly large suburban lawns, clamoring for war with Iran, and buying flu shots. Guess what - they’d be the first to attack you for visiting this blog, OldMan, fervently pointing out your “lack of morality”.

“No time in the history of cultural warfare has any side won that declared itself immoral or amoral.”

What does that even mean? Yeah, no time in this supposed history of cultural warfare has any side won that declared itself totally supportive of gang rape either.

Jews, on a whole, are the most moral of people, just like they tell you all ad nauseam. OldMan just can’t understand that because Tel Aviv brothels and Bernie Madoff are an affront to his sensibilities. Get a different word for your sense of aesthetics, pal.

************************************[11/23c/09]***********************************

["Crypto-Aryan" writes, at Occidental Dissent:]

Thanks for the feedback on my questions about alternative explanations of the Holocaust. I’m still looking into the story. I was very disappointed with the Germar Rudolf book, supposedly the best one there is. I just couldn’t get past all the blatant obfuscations at the beginning of it.

[NN responds:]

I would second the Captain’s question about “obfuscations” - but would suggest that Rudolph *did not* engage the most convincing aspect of the gas chamber issue. Namely, the vital ventilation structures of the facilities that are purported to have been the mightiest engines of human destruction in recorded history. Ironically, it is closely-held documents upon which the Exterminationists have relied, and which they have obviously failed to analyze, that most convincingly serve the demolition of the myth structure that has been erected around Auschwitz, when they are challenged to produce such evidence in behalf of their case.

And once one has realized that the alleged deportations of hundreds of thousands of persons to Auschwitz, in which facility they neither died nor from which they departed, did not take place, one has struck from the hands of the Exterminationists their main evidentiary device, the putative authenticity of mutually-supportive records as to deportations thereto from various European nations.

And I say this from personal knowledge, having confronted the champions of the Hoax with the challenge to produce their evidence - which evidence proved to be an embarrassment to the very thesis they hoped to defend therewith. One such champion was reduced to indefensible silence, when repeatedly challenged merely to identify the known date when cremations were finally initiated in Krema II, in 1943, lest that date imply, according to his own argument and the official account, that Bischoff’s incriminating “letter” to his superior, Kammler, was a clumsy forgery and that there was no “Vergasungskeller” in the mightiest engine, Leichenkeller I. Lacking that appliance, hundreds of thousands of allegedly exterminated victims thereof are revived by history to be accounted for by other than the Holohoax tale of evil-doing.

************************************[11/23a/09]***********************************

["OldRight" instructs us in the essentials of racial morality:]

Let me elaborate on why jews don’t want to make common cause with whites. We whites have a moral instinct, a conscience, that is in absolute opposition to the jewish way of life. Jews are naturally dishonest schemers. Most of them only care about sex, money and tribal power. The conflict between jews and whites has two sides. Whites offend jews with their white moral code. Especially regarding sex. Jews offend whites with their shameless greed and polymorphous perversity.

[I.e., Jews are grown-ups and Whites are children. Thus, is it any wonder who must govern and who must submit?]

************************************[11/23/09]***********************************

For a “Federal Reserve *Note*” is both nominally and actually an instrument of debt - it does not *permanently* circulate - it must ultimately go back to the Federal Reserve in payment of someone’s debt - presumably to be re-loaned so as to maintain the velocity of the money supply in commercial transactions. Hence the Greater Judean monetary system is *intrinsically unstable* and constantly vulnerable to a deflationary interruption of the credit cycle, such as we are now suffering (and as was the basis of the easily remediable Great Depression), lately due to the insane affirmative-action (Communist egalitarian) lending practices of the Clinton and Bush-fronted regimes, and to the corrupt legalization, by Congress, of bank-exploited gambling instruments in the form of CDSs derivative of the consequent toxic mortgages, and to the fact that the extension of credit must continue in the system for its maintenance - NO MATTER THE WISDOM OF CONTINUING TO EXTEND CREDIT OTHERWISE. (NeoNietzsche)

Question: Were the Congressional re-legalization of financial gambling instruments, and the subornation of the rating agencies, and the affirmative action (Judeo-Communist egalitarian) mortage extensions merely the product of corruption and ideological incompetence - and is their present consequence merely the coincidence of these despicable elements?

************************************[11/18/09]************************************

Our Exterminationists are at great pains to deny that any irregularity of evidence or legal procedure can be said to be true of the HoloHoax and the Nuremberg Show Trials. But it is the case that they could well argue that those who were prosecuting Nazis were merely planting evidence on the perps so as to facilitate the administration of justice. They could easily concede that any number of documents and testimonies were forged and extorted, and still maintain that millions of irregular deaths occurred in Nazi-land.

So why don't they make the appropriate concessions - i.e., that yes, the Bischoff "Vergasungskeller" letter is a clumsy forgery, Hoess and Broad were extorted and gave synoptic false testimony at trial as a dead giveaway thereof, Baer was telling the truth about the absence of homicidal facilities at Auschwitz, that there were no gas chambers anywhere, etc. - but, nevertheless, a whole bunch of people were shot in the East. One suspects that they fear the exposure of the vast context of lies within which these frauds were perpetrated - and perhaps they fear derivative justification of the Nazis in their attempt to be rid of the Jews.

************************************[11/17/09]************************************

["Kasimir Petrenkov" comments with regard to yesterday's TFTD:]

A few hours ago I debated some moron on a semi-racialist website (who actually was trying to advance the view that Yankee-Judaea is not an empire) and it dawned on me: There was a time in my life when I would have been mortified to express an opinion like this, but today, I have only disdain for American peasants. They're ugly, stupid, vile herd animals whose over-the-top egos are only matched by their degenerate appetites. The sooner these scum shove off the face of the planet, the happier the Ubermensch who remain will be. Call me a misanthrope if you will, but honestly, the world would be a better place with these parasitic subhumans removed.

************************************[11/16/09]************************************

The Earth is crying out for a threshing and it’s coming, much bigger than any normal intervention has ever been prior. While the Jews have all the slackjawed yokels fixing their gaze on the menacing spectre of towelheads charging on their goats to destroy the West … meanwhile Russia and China are 180 degrees opposite preparing to relieve all these gawping jackasses of their pathetic lives in a single day. So by all means keep worrying about Abdul the Falafel cook over there where my finger is pointing.

("Bill Baxter" @ VNN)

************************************[11/14/09]************************************

The Lower Class Man prides himself on making a slave *of* his Woman.

The Middle Class Man prides himself on being a slave *to* his Woman.

The Upper Class Man prides himself on providing a slave *for* his Woman.

************************************[11/12b/09]**********************************

Another ludicrous aspect of the supposed disappearance of "Communism" is the putative vindication of *everyone's* ideological position, all across the political spectrum.

The Left is off the hook for megacidal Leninism and Stalinism, now that everything has turned out all right in the end and all those omelet eggs were not broken altogether in vain. And the Right has shown that Capitalism, as they have known all along, is the best way of doing business, everywhere on the planet.

Of course, informed students of political history know that when the Right and the Left agree on an agenda and the interpretation and evaluation of an historical event (z.B., "The Good War"), Jewry's purposes and propaganda are operative, in a magnificent deception of the public and the distortion of its consciousness.

[In her *Russia--Lost in Transition: the Yeltsin and Putin Legacies*," by Liliia Fedorovna Shevtsova, she reports a 2006 poll showing that 71% of Russians "regretted" the dissolution of the USSR. And she characterizes the present "Russian" state as a "pseudo-democracy," engaged in a game of "Let's Pretend" that this autocracy is something other than it is. (Deja vu all over again!)]

************************************[11/12a/09]**********************************

["Ragnar de Lodbrock" quickly responds to our previous TFTD:]

"And one should adduce here, in evidence, [credulity at] the clumsy and transparent street theater of the "coup" against Gorbachev, the "heroism" of Yeltsin atop the AFV, and the "assault" on the parliament building, as symptomatic of a pathetic and universal lack of any sense of politico-economic logic in the deluded West, combined with a craven desire to find ideological vindication in the events, however vague the basis thereof." - NeoNietzsche

Whenever I hear this sort of claptrap, I respond: "Russia is run by the same elite which ran it in Communist days. Aside from some differences in political and economic structure, the ideology and methodology of the regime is exactly the same." Russia never ceased being Communist, perhaps even more importantly one must realize that "capitalism" and "communism" in their global manifestations are two sides of the same coin.

No, silly goyim, Communism is not dead. Your brains are, however.

************************************[11/12/09]************************************

Form-of-government is a matter of utility, not morality. It is a tool or weapon that takes various forms according to the purposes to which it is put - peace or war (and class war or international war) and thus in varying degrees of centralization and supervision of economy and populace. (NeoNietzsche)

Thus "Communism" with its allied ism's is not a system of government - it is an egalitarian revolt against the civilization-sustaining stratification of society, conducted with whatever form of government suits the advancement of that cause.

Of the latter there are basically two versions: a centralized and socialized war/command economy where an overt conflict is being conducted - and a "liberal" and oligopolistic/oligarchic "peace" economy where conflict is conducted irregularly and sub rosa.

And, of this latter, we have the historic example of the cretinous, crypto-Communist, F.D. Roosevelt-fronted, Frankfurter administration, that conducted a campaign, amidst domestic peace and under no actual threat from abroad, of secret provocation of the Axis powers, so that the purposes of international Jewry might be served in drawing the resistant population of a sham "democracy" into the conflict against its own interests.

Plus the example of the current "Russian" and Red Chinese regimes, that are doing as militant regimes do in making use of the weapons, now in governmental and economic organization, of the imperialist militarists whom they have discovered they can destroy by no other means.

But goyim will insist that "Communism" has been universally discredited and abandoned, in the magnificently stupid misunderstanding of the culture thereof - one in which they are veritably swimming - as merely a system or form of government that may "collapse" or be "overthrown".

[And one should adduce here, in evidence, (credulity at) the clumsy and transparent street theater of the "coup" against Gorbachev, the "heroism" of Yeltsin atop the AFV, and the "assault" on the parliament building, as symptomatic of a pathetic and universal lack of any sense of politico-economic logic in the deluded West, combined with a craven desire to find ideological vindication in the events, however vague the basis thereof.]

************************************[11/12/09]************************************

The Kingdom of God and the Utopia of Man are intrinsically unrealizable, not because men are sinners or are evil, but because it is an intractable aspect of the administration of human affairs and in the nature of organic existence.

*************************************[11/11/09]***********************************

With regard to yesterday's "Thought," many an anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist will ludicrously and ironically declare that they have been to and even lived in the Eastern Europe of today and that there is no "Communism" over there any more. Just as millions of persons, visiting and living in the West, are stupidly unaware (in the view of our bigot) that Jewry governs their lives as the resident oligarchic power, with an alien and hostile (Communist) agenda that is not generally advertised in exposure of that fact.

It does not occur to the racist right-wing peasant that the highly effective tactic of permanent governance from behind the scenes might have been noticed and adopted by the mortal enemies of the veiled plutocracies. This recognition would, unfortunately, dismiss the seemingly healthy regimes of Eastern Europe from playing their part as the Great White Hope of racists in the West, and so recognition of the demoralizing fact of the matter must itself be excluded.

************************************[11/10/09]************************************

Even the goy who thinks himself "highly intelligent," with an "elite education," and now "on to" the machinations of Jewry is ludicrously oblivious to the extent of the deception perpetrated at his expense. (NeoNietzsche)

Cases in point:

*Those who believe that something called "Communism" "collapsed" in Eastern Europe.

*Those who believe that something called "Communism" was "overthrown" in Eastern Europe.

In fact, the Soviet state apparatus was *dismantled* by the *decree* of Gorbachev under no pressure of organized dissent or armed force (thus it did not "collapse"). And this was not anticipated by the CIA precisely because there was no evidence of such pressure to be detected by espionage or other survey (thus it was not "overthrown").

The decree was strictly the secret initiative of the Soviet oligarchy, in pursuit of long-planned-for strategic deception according to their own timetable - which pursuit and deception is furthered, even today, by gross falsifications of the history of pertinent events, in movies and documentaries foisted on the credulous and wishful goyim by the MSM.

The episode, as received wisdom in the West, serves not only the ultimate crypto-anarchist objectives of the militant Asian regimes, but to confuse and affront any sense of politico-economic logic and history in comprehending such phenomena. As if the Soviet metal-eaters could be shamed and intimidated into fainting straight away and giving away their polity for their failure to provide enough fashionable clothing to the general populace. As if large, sovereign political entities with huge armed forces can ever be "bankrupt" in the sense of the dispossession to which an unarmed household can be put, or that (supposed) failure in an arms race and/or its exertions can lead to a spontaneous, unforced "collapse" of a militant regime. This is nonsense akin to believing in perpetual motion and over-unity machines, in violation of the "physics" of political-economy - from the vital study of which the goyim are excluded by their own lack of inclination, as they are bred, rather, for a life devoted to vocational cud-chewing and philosophical bovinity.

What we have, in consequence, is the desire to project vague ideological wish-fulfillment upon events amidst a ludicrous lack of specifics as to the reasons *for* the events.

Supposedly, the Soviet (class-war) economy was unworkable (whereas it was performing quite as war/command economies are expected to do in their deprivations and impositions). So it needed to be "reformed" according to "Capitalist" principles, lest it "collapse" or be "overthrown" (as ubiquitous wish-mongering would have the factual dismantling delusionally characterized). Then, after the actual event, "reforms" were imposed upon and endured by the state, economy, and populace, in magnificently ironic proof that "Capitalism" is just as predatory and destructive as Marx had said it was. But a domestic "revolution" did not emerge therefrom, because the regime retained control of the situation from behind the scenes, and when the lesson was re-learned by the suffering populace as to the historic evils of "Capitalism," Putin easily ejected the "Oligarchs" and restored KGB/FSB-enforced order to the surface of events as well.

It is to laugh at the self-deceptive stupidity of it all. There was no valid showing, in theory or practice, that the West attends to its objectives in any more effective manner than does the Soviet. What is evident is that the tactics of the regimes are divergent, accounting for the differing circumstances of the general populations involved. A "Communist" regime is historically and typically at war with civilization with different weapons - working from the bottom up, so to speak, and thus bringing its "Soldiers and Workers" - resident in a "barracks state" and enduring a straitened war economy - to bear against the objective enemy with arms and explosives. The "Russians" and Red Chinese have since become more sophisticated and deceptively convergent with the West, in putting somewhat more "liberal" administrative means to work for the world-wide egalitarian revolution against stratification, having exterminated any effective resistance to their agenda and regime with an overt police-state apparatus that has now been discarded as having served its past purposes and as a present impediment to strategic deception of form-of-government fools.

On the other hand, the Greater Judean regime is at work, from the top down, demoralizing and deluding the "Bourgeoisie" with Faustian lies, illusions, and indulgences and thus depriving them of preparedness for, and perception of, the ongoing global underclass onslaught. A campaign now well-advanced upon the global defeat of the Axis powers, accomplished with the invaluable contributions of the ironically racist anti-Nazi "conceited morons" of *that* day, under the guidance of veiled Jewish masters who praise their deity for the incredible stupidity of their captive goyim.

And so, even the anti-Semitic bigot, however "intelligent" and "educated" and Jew-smart he thinks he is, remains a fool in his uninstructed belief that something called "freedom" will out if only enough people will demand it, per the fantasy example of a supposedly self-liberated Eastern Europe, or take refuge in it in a pathetic and vulnerable Northwestern Vilcabamba, or shoot their way toward it, as "Free White Men" sniping at (Gibson's proto-Nazi) Redcoats at Concord in the delusional belief that moronic peasants can enduringly govern themselves, once (temporarily) free of any mastery.

************************************[11/09/09]************************************

The Frankfurt School viewed contemporary Western societies of the 1930s and '40s as “soft authoritarianism” — a phrase also used by Tom Sunic in describing contemporary Western societies. From their point of view, the basic problem was to explain the lack of revolutionary fervor in Western societies. Quite clearly, orthodox Marxism was wrong: The predicted revolution hadn't happened.

In fact, it had.

The Judeo-Communist *international* revolutionary leadership had merely been busy stampeding their goyim toward trampling Hitler and the Axis, rather than directing their major resources to the minor matter of national-scale subversion. The World Revolution thus took a Great Leap Forward, globally, in destroying the last bastions of durably ordered society in the East and in the West.

Of course, the lack of "revolutionary fervor" of today is a (temporary) product of the Faustian Pact with which the destruction of the sophisticated Axis entities was accomplished. The degenerate Anglo-American imperial goyim ("conceited morons") were elevated beyond their appropriate station on the planet by the mendacious Judeo-Communist alliance with their "objective enemy," the relentless Soviet primitives. They thus enjoy a bounty, for now, that naturally suppresses the Marxist revolutionary urge. But the Devil's Bill must be paid, as it always has, and we may anticipate - according to fundamental politico-economic and agronomic principles - that giga-cidal anarchy will create a planetary Hell on Earth, by the mid-century point of the present era, at the latest.

************************************[11/08/09]************************************

Mankind evidenced a strong devolutionary tendency when religion devolved from a mere misunderstanding or romantic myth into a consolation and a narcotic.

And, most recently, the "Revolt against Civilization" made considerable "progress" when primitive and degenerate elements came together to bring chaos out of order.

************************************[11/02/09]************************************

[More from the 'TARDS ON PARADE file:]

LOL @ junk-food Nietzsche, bogged down in clumsy schtick…

“I BIG JEW SOOPERMAN!
I SMARTER THAN U ALL!
I BUY MANY CHIMICHANGAS AT COSTCO FOR CHEEP!”

("NeoMachiavelli")

************************************[10/30/09]************************************

An economy with a debt-based currency is as secure as a ship constantly bailed by the crew to keep it afloat.

************************************[10/25/09]************************************

[Mark I. comments:]

LOL at the uproar over at MR. It is amazing to me that people there think you, uh, Proze and others are all the same. I've encountered this myself on other WN forums, the cries of "sock puppets" and what have you. The immaturity on our side always manifests if given long enough.

Isn't it funny how one need only take a pessimistic/realistic view of our situation and articulate it to send the majority of these pro-whites into frenzy? Certainly if they cannot take some "constructive criticism" of their worldview, it does not bode well for their international crusade against world Jewry.

P.S. I take issue with PF's contention that caste is an illusion. There are people, are there not, who are elevated in terms of intellectual or warlike qualities? And indeed those are determined not by striving but at birth by heredity. Caste is not illusion, it is biological reality.

************************************[10/22a/09]**********************************

Freedom, if it has any meaning at all, is the state of living under a bondage that is compatible and harmonizes with the most vital instincts of one’s being. Our people need to escape from a bondage that is uncongenial to their deepest instincts — egalitarian democracy — in order to fall into a bondage that harmonizes with their instincts.

("Yosemite" @ OD)

************************************[10/22/09]************************************

[Another specimen from our 'TARDS ON PARADE file:]

NN ~ You want my response? Here it is: Fuck you. I’m not going to let you control the discussion here. You’re a pseudo-intellectual poseur, and possibly some sort of crypto-Jew, and I’ve called you on it. Now fuck off.

("The Admiral" @ OD)

************************************[10/21/09]************************************

[From the cavity of an Occidental Dissenter:]

And out there in the Great White American Wilderness they’ll surely be more than enough of room to create numerous formations of Neo-Nietzsche’s desired roving gangs of nomadic steppe horsemen — the Great Plains of the USA would be perfect for recreating that exact scenario, after all. And maybe sometimes we’ll even hand over to the horsemen a few criminal White peasants, trespassing Mestizos, and subversive Jews so that he and his men can have their ‘Aryan kicks’ trampling the faces of those unfortunates with the hooves of their horses.

[Evidently, the discussion, in the black column, of *Napoleon* (as in commanding a modern imperial army?) - adduced as a central example and symbol of Nietzschean ideology and aspiration - passed over the heads of some readers.]

[Beyond that oversight, our peasant betrays a remarkable mind-set in so identifying. Even were we to back up the recording of irreversible demographic/cultural evolution such as to participate in this little vignette our peasant has arranged for our imagination - why would he participate as the victim? The answer seems to be that he is *natively* a slave and is not merely the victim of conditioning by masterful alien propaganda. He is thus complicit in promotion of this attitude toward life in his implicit pouting about the *injustice/unfairness/not-niceness* of the warriors' treatment of those who have not the manhood of a dominance hierarchy of their own with which to oppose and impose organized force.]

************************************[10/16/09]************************************

[From "Occidental Dissent," message #81, "Some Changes" thread, by "uh":]

It is that kind detachment from and disdain for the rest of your racial/ethnic kinsman which has lead us to where we are today.

A deeper look might reveal that I, myself ["uh"], am not to blame for the present state of affairs, and that precisely this desire to condemn every slightest departure from orthodoxy and blame it for much broader social ills stems from the same “altruistic punishment” which has led whites to flagellate each other over how ecstatically they welcome aliens. In this case, I’m flagellated for not blurring my vision to the point where these goofy post-white Americans can be perceived as my “kinsmen” (in effect for perceiving myself as “the Other”, or vice versa). No, that isn’t how sociology works. You can’t feign a tribe or tribal feeling, no more than you can feign the works of a tribe resulting from its tribal feeling.

Your house will not stand without a solid foundation, and that foundation can only be constructed a certain material, your co-ethnics.

My “co-ethnics” have nothing to offer me, nor I them. You believe in a mythos of numbers: I don’t. I behold the progressive enslavement and self-oblivion of white races and see the intractable pitiless march of history, where you see a kind of leisurely stroll that can be directed anywhere with enough preaching. My “co-ethnics” — who are they? Carthartt-wearing laborers? fat girls in scarves at Starbucks? cheerful anal-retentive blond soccer moms following their tiny dogs with plastic bags around their hands to “pick up poop”?

No, that is your race: not mine! I don’t resemble them, I don’t think or act or feel like them, and I refuse your pushy preaching to the contrary. It flies in the face of observable and scientific differences no less than blurring distinctions between white races and the black or brown races. Not all whites are equal. Not all whites are the same. There is not one white race. The dominant white race in America, the post-Nordic, is a worthless congeries of clownish conceited morons

************************************[10/15/09]************************************

[From the "Phora," message of 3/12/8, by "Petr":]

Warlike steppe nomadism was indeed the "original condition" of Aryan peoples. Even during the first few centuries AD, some Indo-European peoples like Scythians and Parthians were still living in this phase.

(Only around 400 AD did Turko-Mongol peoples begin to rule the Central Asian steppes instead of them.)

It took a long time for Aryan invaders to "settle down" in Europe and India, and to start cultivating the earth. And even then, Aryan noblemen still long considered ploughing the soil (image so beloved by Volkisch nostalgists) as a lowly drudgery fit only for Sudras and serfs.

Indo-European nobles (chevaliers, caballeros, rittern) were fundamentally horsemen, always ready to ride away for fighting glory, and had contempt for peasants. The badass posture of motorcycle gangs is a modern remnant of this Ur-Rider attitude.

"Most of the things white racialists (particularly the more romantic and mythologically oriented ones) actually appreciate about "white" culture are those so-called matriarchal features it retains, like community minded-ness and respect for women and folkish art and culture. "

Yeah, the mysterious pre-Aryan inhabitants of Europe... Pelasgians etc.

[(NN comments:) Amusingly, my point about "class analysis" is once again illustrated by a division, here, between conception of the Aryan (noble) as historic warrior/noble/aristocrat and the "Aryan" as an ig-noble peasant agriculturalist. This is a bitter division in the White wing (see latest 'tard, paraded below, on 10/01/09) wherein the stupid inversion of the case confuses mastery, in general, with the Jewish instance, in particular. Since the Jew is a materialist, concerned with governance and exploitation of *this* world ("the only world there is," Nietzsche) - as are all culturally mature masters - it pleases the *racist* class-warrior to declare *all* mastery essentially "Jewish" - as opposed to the "spirituality" of the subordinate labor of the hard-working "Aryan," who thus appears as a shiningly pure and childish (thus stereotypically negroid) victim of greasy masters throughout history - whether those masters were Jewish or not, in the proper sense. Thus Roman Senators, z.B., were "essentially" Jewish, in this bizarre Platonic/Schopenhauerian reconstruction/inversion of history and vocabulary. So, again, as we see, the question of *class* cannot be ignored in our analyses.]

************************************[10/04/09]************************************

”It would be very easy to end the Fed.

“The Congress could issue debt free dollars. Very simple.” ("damielj")

“DEBT-FREE DOLLARS” should be shouted from the rooftops all over this land.

For a “Federal Reserve *Note*” is both nominally and actually an instrument of debt - it does not *permanently* circulate - it must ultimately go back to the Federal Reserve in payment of someone’s debt - presumably to be re-loaned so as to maintain the velocity of the money supply in commercial transactions. Hence the Greater Judean monetary system is *intrinsically unstable* and constantly vulnerable to a deflationary interruption of the credit cycle, such as we are now suffering (and as was the basis of the easily remediable Great Depression), lately due to the insane affirmative-action (Communist egalitarian) lending practices of the Clinton and Bush-fronted regimes, and to the corrupt legalization, by Congress, of bank-exploited gambling instruments in the form of CDSs derivative of the consequent toxic mortgages, and to the fact that the extension of credit must continue in the system for its maintenance - NO MATTER THE WISDOM OF CONTINUING TO EXTEND CREDIT OTHERWISE.

But a “Fed” *is* necessary to regulate growth of a permanent money supply.

However, according to my own formula - the only *good* Fed is *your* Fed, even in that instance. [And some of you will want to say, in that instance, that the only good Fed is nevertheless a *dead* Fed - but that's immature].

************************************[10/02/09]************************************

The only *good* government is *your* government! (NeoNietzsche)

This is to say that form-of-government is a matter of utility, not morality. It is a tool or weapon that takes various forms according to the purposes to which it is put - peace or war (and class war or international war) and thus in varying degrees of centralization and supervision of economy and populace.

In any case it will always favor the interests and purposes of those who control it. One of the most popular political illusions is that a government of laws is realizable that will impartially see to the interests of persons not in positions of authority. Hence the Libertarian fallacy. Government is ultimately conducted according to the inclinations of men, in convenient interpretation, selection, or disregard of the laws - laws which, intrinsically, cannot be made both complete, coherent, and concise.

************************************[10/01/09]************************************

[A selection from our 'TARDS ON PARADE file:]

BTW in my opinion you [NN] don’t even rise to the level of a nigger gang-banger, let alone any Nietzschean overman. Must be the jewish memes making you think you are some sort of anything, when frankly you’re not even a man yet, just some sort of freak who is indulged at the expense of decency for the sake of jewish degeneracy. Perhaps you can overcome it, you know actually live a life of some benefit to your people. Doubt it, but maybe in the future when order is established we can help you become some kind of man.

("Anthony" @ OD)

************************************[09/27/09]************************************

...there is a more general and grievous error in believing that presently engineering the mere exclusion of racial aliens from our midst is a solution to our politico-economic woes.

It was, after all, a relatively pure nation of “Whites” that arranged or was subjected to the antecedents of the present declension.

These antecedents were the outcome of the inescapable class division and confrontation of the turn into the Twentieth Century into which International Jewry inserted itself in service to a plutocracy that had neither the inclination nor organization to deal with the Populist challenge to the continued economic depredations of a (relatively) laissez-faire regime.

So, as the insider, Cholly Bilderberger, long ago instructed us in the pages of *Instauration*, we were sold into the hands of Jewry (who knew how to manipulate the stupid Populists to their own ends) in a Faustian Pact that preserved the plutocrats’ wealth, at the expense of condemning the nation to eventual catastrophe.

I am pointing to, then, the secessionist impulse as a product of comfortable and ideologically-facilitated ignorance about politico-economic history and logic that require as much attention to the analysis of society in terms of *class* as in terms of race. This former analysis projects that a concentration of Whites would eventually provide the same target-rich environment for alien exploitation of class divisions amongst those whites (who are not even supposed to be unified, pro tempore, in diversional warfare as were the orders of Roman society, pending the climax of imperial expansion and the outbreak of class-war anyway).

************************************[09/26/09]************************************

There is, in addition to the notion of the “rights” of Whites, the difficulty with putative White “racial superiority”.

For those who govern are, eo ipso and ipso facto, “superior”.

This means that the Jews - and derivatively, the Negroes - are our betters, in the present instance.

As the *Romans* understood, one’s superiority in the real world is the collective product of victory on the battlefield and is the literal holding of the whip during labor performed by the vanquished. It is so much more comfortable and convenient, however, in modern bourgeois occupation with individual pursuits, to account one’s superiority visceral, personal, and thus without need for realization by collective mastery of the bodies of others.

So one understands why the Romans were the last White men to durably govern themselves, for a few centuries at least, without interference and ultimate mastery by the alien props and pillars of state, the Universal Church and International Jewry.

************************************[08/31/09]************************************

Communism is generally misunderstood as, and misidentified with, police-state totalitarianism. Thus misunderstood, "Communism" has putatively "collapsed" in the former USSR (but has now metastasized from the larger thought-policed English-speaking world into New Zealand, of all places).

The author below correctly associates anarchism, from the inside, with Marxism and its various shadings into the pink, whereby we may, instead, correctly understand the historic Communist/Marxist/Bolshevist agenda as crypto-anarchism, deceptively super-structured with socialist egalitarian utopianist ideological and eschatological planking.

This Trojan Horse has advanced worldwide in the form of variously attractive breeds thereof (Great Society/Civil Rights/Feminism/Affirmative Action/Freudianism/Gramscian Cultural Marxism/Deconstruction/Multi-culturalism/Postmodernism/Critical Theory/Cultural Anthropology/Praxis) - not into categorical declension and extinction - but rather from victory unto victory in its preparatory propaganda measures toward ultimate annihilation of all ordered existence on the planet through the continued elimination (however violently or subtly) of capable ruling classes/races and by virtue of intrinsic anarchist mega-/gigacidal incompetence in succedaneous administration of subdued polities. (see Sutton on Soviet Development, and, inter alia, see today's symptomatic sub-prime affirmative-action lending catastrophe) :

Essentially, the general flavor of the anarchist milieu is one that expresses the same set of primary values as Marxists, social democrats and left-liberal Democratic Party activists, with the added qualification of “by the way, we’re also against the state as well.”

http://www.toqonline.com/2009/07/forty-years-in-the-wilderness/

************************************[08/16/09]************************************

Not surprisingly in retrospect, enlightenment brought depression. On the one hand, it was fascinating to discover that there was an entire layer of reality about which I had been completely ignorant, and which imbued existence with a new level of complexity — and danger. On the other hand, it was depressing to find that the present historical trajectory led, not to the future of mind-blowing technologies, space exploration, and scientific discovery that I had come to imagine through my exposure to science fiction, but to a gloomy future of cultural decline, universal poverty, state-sponsored oppression, and intellectually-orchestrated racial extinction.

Once awakened to these realities, it became increasingly difficult not to notice a persistent and all pervasive pattern of semiotic bias and deception encoded in all Western television and general media content. Moreover, it became increasingly easy to identify how this content had been designed, sponsored, or otherwise shaped by plutocratic, ideologically-harmonious, and often tribal cliques, who had an interest in anticipating and neutralizing opposition to their nefarious order through conscious or semi-conscious strategies of public distraction, disinformation, enculturation, and infantilization.

I came to see, in other words, how television was not simply a provider of entertainment for its brainless audiences, a source of employment for its frivolous professionals, and a font of profits for its money-hungry proprietors; but also a cognitive anesthetic, which encouraged a non-threatening, system-preserving lifestyle of superficial and trivial knowledge, political conformity and passivity, and narcissistic and pleasure-oriented consumption. A society whose populace is ignorant, sedentary, and materialistic is not a society whose academic, political, and media establishment fears its dislodgement and disprivileging by violent revolution.

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Kurtagic-TV.html#AK

Historic Faustian Pacts
with International Entities

*G. W. Bush: Presides over another "Pearl Harbor" (9-11) arranged to accommodate the Kosher-con PNAC blueprint, and destroys the regime and person of the current Hitler-du-jour (Saddam, his personal enemy and a threat to Israel) under multiple false pretenses that go unexposed by the coordinated Jewish MSM. What has now become, ironically and hypocritically, a Judeo-American dictatorship ("Greater Judea") ingratiates itself with tout le monde by pursuing Judeo-fascist and economic imperialist foreign policies under the pretense and pretext of nobly forwarding and sustaining "democracy" (however unbidden the forwarding (Iraq) or phony the sustaining (Israel)) - which policy is nostalgically exploited by crypto-Communist Russia in, inter alia, multiple S. American polities ("Latin America is turning Red." -- Gennady Zyuganov; quoted in Eurasia Daily Monitor, January 27, 2006), evidently in pursuit of the destruction of its old "objective enemy" in the race toward global apocalypse.
*F. D. Roosevelt: "Old Bolshevik" Felix Frankfurter staffs the Roosevelt administration with 200 "Happy Hotdogs" and in so doing infests it with Soviet espionage agents, propagandists, Fifth Amendment cases, etc. He saves the failing New Deal by persuading the newly-converted Marxist-Leninist, F.D.R., toward maneuvering the Japanese into providing a "Back door To War" with Germany. International Jewry is thus allowed to stampede its stupid goyim into Europe to sanctimoniously and mock-heroically gore Germany in the back while Hitler is engaged in a preemptive strike at megacidal Soviet Judeo-Bolshevism. Once again, a putative Allied "victory" is purchased at the expense of destroying three Western empires and of further extending Judeo-Bolshevist polities and propaganda, with their ultimate promise of terminating civilization throughout the globe.
*Churchill: Otherwise destitute, his services as a politican and propagandist are purchased by an ad hoc international Jewish pressure group, Focus, in pursuit of international war against the Third Reich. Churchill is willing to bankrupt his own Empire so that he might play the great man while concealing and thwarting German efforts to arrange peace in the West and destroy Judeo-Communism in the East.
*Woodrow Wilson: Conspires with England (House-Grey Memorandum) to involve America in WWI, contrary to solemn promises otherwise. Jewry receives a pledge of Palestine as a "homeland" (Balfour Declaration) despite the wishes of its 700,000 residents, and America is brought into the war as Jewry's part of the bargain. And the American plutocracy is saved from W.J.Bryan's Populists by granting the latter's desired central bank (Glass Act/Federal Reserve) while staffing the bank with the agents of the very plutocracy to have been controlled by the bank. The plan is devised by an agent of international Jewish banking interests (Paul Warburg) in exchange for a free hand in the penetration of American institutions with mendacious, destructive egalitarian doctrines and with catastrophic debt-based fiat-money circulation. Finally, the Allied "victory" in Europe is purchased at the price of the destruction of three ordered Western polities and of the empowerment of anarchic, megacidal, and globally ambitious Judeo-Bolshevism.
*Bismarck: Is subsidized by Jewish banker Bleichroeder in an "end run" around the Frankfurt Assembly, which would not financially support ambitions for the martial unification of the German States. The premature Empire cannot contemplate the integration of conquered France, thus setting the stage for the disaster of the First World War.
*Cromwell: Is subsidized by Ben Israel in exchange for the establishment and control of a Bank of England. International Jewry thus begins the replacement of the Universal Church as the diabolical supra-national interest promoting short-term advantage at the price of ultimate catastrophe.
*William the Conqueror: His Norman Duchy relies upon a nucleus of three hundred ecclesiastical knights, granted in exchange for administrative and evangelical privileging of local episcopacies. The Conquest of England is otherwise impossible. The "English" crown is thereafter compromised administratively by its premature territorial unity while under ecclesiastically-enforced feudal contracts and later provokes a catastrophic and unsustainable (in terms of an enduring victory) Hundred Years' War over disputed cross-Channel territories. The further maintenance of its primitive and premature administrative structure provokes it to, and dooms it in, a 17th Century Civil War found serviceable by International Jewry.
*Otto the Great: The Holy Roman Empire relies upon an army of ecclesiastical knights, forming two-thirds of its ranks, to sustain the state in the midst of feudal disintegration elsewhere. Henry IV is humiliated at Canossa when Gregory VII pronounces him excommunicate and thus without an army. But Henry's damaging contrition permits his continuation of the Church's war against the Saxon champions of native faith and culture.
*Pepin: Recognizes the phony Donation of Constantine in exchange for the Church's blessing of the Austrasian usurpation of the effete Frankish crown. The war on native faith and culture continues.
*Clovis: Adopts and enforces his wife's Christianity in the expanding Frankish realm in exchange for the fifth-column services of the clergy in enemy territory. The war on native faith and culture begins.
*Theodosius: Imposes his bigoted Christianity as the official and only tolerated Imperial religion, in order to align the Church as an administrative supplement to the disintegrating state apparatus.
*Constantine: Issues the Edict of Milan, offering toleration of Christianity in return for Christian support of, rather than resistance to, the Roman state.

SELECTED SUPERHUMAN MULTI-DISCIPLINARY READING

A Genius for War
American Economic Republic
Antichrist
Assault on the Liberty
Back Door to War
Battle for the Mind
Bell Curve
Beyond Good and Evil
Blacklisted by History
Blond Knight of Germany
Civilization and its Discontents
Commissary to the Gentiles
Controversy of Zion
Culture of Critique
Das Kapital/Mein Kampf
Deception (E.J. Epstein)
Decline of the West
Draka Tetralogy
Ecce Homo
Essays in Positive Economics
Future of an Illusion
Genealogy of Morals
General Theory (Keynes)
Great Holocaust Trial
Great Sedition Trial (Dennis)
Hitler Moves East
Hitler's War (Irving)
Hoax of the 20th Century
Human Action
Hut Six Story
Infamy (Toland)
Inside the Third Reich
Israel Lobby
Jewish Revolutionary Tradition
Jewish Supremacism
Julian (Vidal)
Knights & Samurai (Lewis)
Language, Truth, and Logic
Lion is Humbled
Lords of Creation (Allen)
Man, Economy, and State
Medieval History (Cantor)
Myth of The Great War
New Industrial State
New Science of Politics
Nuremberg (Irving)
On Aggression
Oriental Despotism
Origins of the Second World War
Origins of Totalitarianism
Perestroika (Gorbachev)
Perestroika Deception
Political Parties [Iron Law] (Michels)
Power Elite
Protestant Establishment
Protocols (forgery)
Pursuit of the Millenium
Report From Iron Mountain (hoax)
Revolt Against Civilization
Separation and its Discontents
Sokal Hoax
Soviet Polity (Reshetar)
Spycatcher (Wright)
Stalin's War of Extermination
Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Territorial Imperative
The Liberators (Suvorov)
Tragedy and Hope
Triumph of Conservatism
Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development
Witness (Chambers)
You Gentiles

SUPERHUMAN

ROOTS ARE SHOWING

No comments:

Post a Comment

About Me